Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700192›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Machine learning-based risk factor analysis and prevalence prediction of intestinal parasitic infections using epidemiological survey data.

Aziz Zafar, Ziad Attia, Mehret Tesfaye, Sosina Walelign, Moges Wordofa, Dessie Abera, Kassu Desta, Aster Tsegaye, Ahmet Ay, Bineyam Taye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aziz ZafarColgate University, Department of Mathematics, Hamilton, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-3021
Ziad AttiaColgate University, Department of Mathematics, Hamilton, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-6688
Mehret TesfayeAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sosina WalelignAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Moges WordofaAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dessie AberaAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kassu DestaAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Aster TsegayeAddis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ahmet AyColgate University, Department of Mathematics, Hamilton, New York, United States of America.
Bineyam TayeColgate University, Department of Biology, Hamilton, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5583-9941
Addis Ababa University · ETColgate University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious epidemiological studies have examined the prevalence and risk factors for a variety of parasitic illnesses, including protozoan and soil-transmitted helminth (STH, e.g., hookworms and roundworms) infections. Despite advancements in machine learning for data analysis, the majority of these studies use traditional logistic regression to identify significant risk factors.

methodsIn this study, we used data from a survey of 54 risk factors for intestinal parasitosis in 954 Ethiopian school children. We investigated whether machine learning approaches can supplement traditional logistic regression in identifying intestinal parasite infection risk factors. We used feature selection methods such as InfoGain (IG), ReliefF (ReF), Joint Mutual Information (JMI), and Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR). Additionally, we predicted children's parasitic infection status using classifiers such as Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF) and XGBoost (XGB), and compared their accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores. For optimal model training, we performed tenfold cross-validation and tuned the classifier hyperparameters. We balanced our dataset using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) method. Additionally, we used association rule learning to establish a link between risk factors and parasitic infections. KEY

findingsOur study demonstrated that machine learning could be used in conjunction with logistic regression. Using machine learning, we developed models that accurately predicted four parasitic infections: any parasitic infection at 79.9% accuracy, helminth infection at 84.9%, any STH infection at 95.9%, and protozoan infection at 94.2%. The Random Forests (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) classifiers achieved the highest accuracy when top 20 risk factors were considered using Joint Mutual Information (JMI) or all features were used. The best predictors of infection were socioeconomic, demographic, and hematological characteristics.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that feature selection and association rule learning are useful strategies for detecting risk factors for parasite infection. Additionally, we showed that advanced classifiers might be utilized to predict children's parasitic infection status. When combined with standard logistic regression models, machine learning techniques can identify novel risk factors and predict infection risk.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSupport Vector MachineChildFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35700192
PMCPMC9236253
OpenAlexW4282917557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.