Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700144›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2022

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation.

Hugh D Simpson, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Gregory D Cascino, Robert S Fisher, Barbara C Jobst, Michael R Sperling, Brian N Lundstrom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugh D SimpsonDivision of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8695-1904
Andreas Schulze-BonhageEpilepsy Center, University Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2382-0506
Gregory D CascinoDivision of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert S FisherDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Neuroscience Health Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-613X
Barbara C JobstDepartment of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Michael R SperlingDivision of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-6006
Brian N LundstromDivision of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-5549
Mayo Clinic · USDartmouth College · USStanford Health Care · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Localizing value and underlying mechanisms of low frequency EEG for focal epilepsyK23NS112339 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LUNDSTROM, BRIAN NILS · 2019 to 2023
$935k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS112339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.

Indexed as

Anterior Thalamic NucleiDeep Brain StimulationDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationHumansRetrospective StudiesSeizuresTreatment Outcomebrain stimulationDBS (deep brain stimulation)neuromodulationRNS (responsive stimulation)VNS (vagus nerve stimulation)

Identifiers

PMID35700144
PMCPMC9888395
OpenAlexW4282834706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.