Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35700109›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2022

Tannin phenotyping of the Vitaceae reveals a phylogenetic linkage of epigallocatechin in berries and leaves.

Jean-Marc Brillouet, Charles Romieu, Roberto Bacilieri, Peter Nick, Anna Trias-Blasi, Erika Maul, Katalin Solymosi, Peter Teszlák, Jiang-Fu Jiang, Lei Sun and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 18 institutions in 12 countries.

Jean-Marc BrillouetINRA, UMR IATE, Montpellier, France.
Charles RomieuINRA, Equipe DAAV, UMR AGAP (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, SupAgro), Montpellier, France.
Roberto BacilieriINRA, Equipe DAAV, UMR AGAP (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, SupAgro), Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-362X
Peter NickKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Botanical Institute, Molecular Cell Biology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Anna Trias-BlasiRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Erika MaulJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Institut für Rebenzüchtung Geilweilerhof, Siebeldingen, Germany.
Katalin SolymosiDepartment of Plant Anatomy, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter TeszlákDepartment of Viticulture and Technology Development, Research Institute of Viticulture and Oenology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-6457
Jiang-Fu JiangZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China.
Lei SunZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China.
Danielle OrtolaniJardin Exotique, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Jason P LondoUSDA, Grape Genetics Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Geneva, New York, NY, USA.
Ben GutierrezUSDA, Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Geneva, New York, NY, USA.
Bernard PrinsUSDA, Nat'l Clonal Germplasm Rep - Tree Fruit & Nut Crops & Grapes, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Marc ReyndersPlantentuin Meise, Meise, Belgium.
Frank Van CaekenberghePlantentuin Meise, Meise, Belgium.
David MaghradzeNational Wine Agency of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Cecile MarchalINRA, Grapevine Biological Resources Center, Experimental Unit of Domaine de Vassal, Marseillan-plage, France.
Amir SultanNational Herbarium (Stewart Collection), National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jean-Francois ThomasJardin Botanique de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Daniel ScherberichJardin Botanique de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Helene FulcrandINRA, UMR IATE, Montpellier, France.
Laurent RoumeasINRA, UMR IATE, Montpellier, France.
Guillaume BillerachINRA, UMR IATE, Montpellier, France.
Vugar SalimovAzerbaijani Scientific Research Institute of Viticulture and Winemaking, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Mirza MusayevGenetic Resources Institute of the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Muhammad Ejaz Ul Islam DarDepartment of Botany, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Jean-Benoit PeltierINRA, UMR BPMP, Montpellier, France.
Michel GrisoniCIRAD, UMR - PVBMT, Toamasina, Madagascar.
Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes · FRAgricultural Research Service · USCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRMeise Botanic Garden · BEZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute · CNAzerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · AZAzerbaijan Scientific-Research & Design-Prospecting Power Engineering Institute · AZEötvös Loránd University · HUInstitut Agro Montpellier · FRJulius Kühn-Institut · DEKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DENational Environmental Agency · GEPakistan Agricultural Research Council · PKRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBScientific Centre of Monaco · MCUniversity of Azad Jammu and Kashmir · PKUniversity of Pecs · HUUniversity of Toamasina · MG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCondensed tannins, responsible for berry and wine astringency, may have been selected during grapevine domestication. This work examines the phylogenetic distribution of condensed tannins throughout the Vitaceae phylogenetic tree.

methodsGreen berries and mature leaves of representative true-to-type members of the Vitaceae were collected before 'véraison', freeze-dried and pulverized, and condensed tannins were measured following depolymerization by nucleophilic addition of 2-mercaptoethanol to the C4 of the flavan-3-ol units in an organic acidic medium. Reaction products were separated and quantified by ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography/diode array detection/mass spectrometry. KEY RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe original ability to incorporate epigallocatechin (EGC) into grapevine condensed tannins was lost independently in both the American and Eurasian/Asian branches of the Vitaceae, with exceptional cases of reversion to the ancestral EGC phenotype. This is particularly true in the genus Vitis, where we now find two radically distinct groups differing with respect to EGC content. While Vitis species from Asia are void of EGC, 50 % of the New World Vitis harbour EGC. Interestingly, the presence of EGC is tightly coupled with the degree of leaf margin serration. Noticeably, the rare Asian EGC-forming species are phylogenetically close to Vitis vinifera, the only remnant representative of Vitis in Eurasia. Both the wild ancestral V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris as well as the domesticated V. vinifera subsp. sativa can accumulate EGC and activate galloylation biosynthesis that compete for photoassimilates and reductive power.

Indexed as

ProanthocyanidinsVitaceaeVitisCatechinFruitPhylogenyPlant LeavesTanninsCatechingallocatecholProanthocyanidinsTanninsAmerican wild grapevinesAsian wild grapevinesCondensed tanninsEGC+ vinesEGC− vinesepigallocatechinleafleaf margin teethpericarpphenotypeVitaceaeVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID35700109
PMCPMC9445598
OpenAlexW4282823719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.