ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022
Machine Learning Support for Decision-Making in Kidney Transplantation: Step-by-step Development of a Technological Solution.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven kidney organ allocation: systematic review of clinical outcome prediction, ethical frameworks, and decision-making algorithms.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2023Pooled it
- From assistant to collaborator: A systematic review of the evolution of artificial intelligence in end-stage renal disease care and management.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Immunosuppressive regimens and long-term kidney transplant outcomes: A dual survival modeling framework.PloS one · 2026Article
- Paired Recipient-based Evaluation of Survival Prediction for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
- Interpretable SVM Model for Predicting CMV Infection in Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation: a 30-year bibliometric analysis of research trends, innovations, and future directions.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: From Early Detection to Clinical Management of Kidney Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Kidney Transplantology: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Predictive Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting joint space changes in knee osteoarthritis over 6 years: a combined model of TransUNet and XGBoost.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Present and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A machine learning approach towards assessing consistency and reproducibility: an application to graft survival across three kidney transplantation eras.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Major areas of interest of artificial intelligence research applied to health care administrative data: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges.XenotransplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney transplantation is the preferred treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. To maximize patient and graft survival, the allocation of donor organs to potential recipients requires careful consideration.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop an innovative technological solution to enable better prediction of kidney transplant survival for each potential donor-recipient pair.
methodsWe used deidentified data on past organ donors, recipients, and transplant outcomes in the United States from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. To predict transplant outcomes for potential donor-recipient pairs, we used several survival analysis models, including regression analysis (Cox proportional hazards), random survival forests, and several artificial neural networks (DeepSurv, DeepHit, and recurrent neural network [RNN]). We evaluated the performance of each model in terms of its ability to predict the probability of graft survival after kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Three metrics were used: the C-index, integrated Brier score, and integrated calibration index, along with calibration plots.
resultsOn the basis of the C-index metrics, the neural network-based models (DeepSurv, DeepHit, and RNN) had better discriminative ability than the Cox model and random survival forest model (0.650, 0.661, and 0.659 vs 0.646 and 0.644, respectively). The proposed RNN model offered a compromise between the good discriminative ability and calibration and was implemented in a technological solution of technology readiness level 4.
conclusionsOur technological solution based on the RNN model can effectively predict kidney transplant survival and provide support for medical professionals and candidate recipients in determining the most optimal donor-recipient pair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.