Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35699950›Full record

Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

"Do not resuscitate" order and end-of-life treatment in a cohort of deceased in a Norwegian University Hospital.

Hans F L van der Werff, Torstein H Michelet, Olav M Fredheim, Siri Steine

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early and late code status documentation in cancer patients managed by a dedicated supportive care team.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans F L van der WerffDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Torstein H MicheletDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Olav M FredheimDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0931-0027
Siri SteineDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA "Do not resuscitate" (DNR) order implies that cardiopulmonary resuscitation will not be started. Absent or delayed DNR orders in advanced chronic disease may indicate suboptimal communication about disease stage, prognosis, and treatment goals. The study objective was to determine clinical practice and patient involvement regarding DNR and the prevalence of life-prolonging treatment in the last week of life.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was made of a cohort of 315 deceased from a large general hospital in Norway. Data on DNR and other treatment limitations, life-prolonging treatment in the last week of life, and cause of death were obtained from medical records.

resultsA DNR order was documented for 287 (91%) patients. Almost half the DNR orders, 142 (49%), were made during the last 7 days of life. The main causes of death were cancer (31%), infectious diseases (31%), and cardiovascular diseases (19%). The most frequent life-prolonging treatments during the last week of life were intravenous fluids in 221 patients (70%) and antibiotics in 198 (63%). During the last week of life, 103 (36%) patients received ICU treatment. Death by cancer (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.24-5.65) and DNR decision made by a palliative care physician (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.21-3.88) were predictors of not receiving life-prolonging treatment.

conclusionThe findings of a high prevalence of life-prolonging treatment in the last week of life and DNR orders being made close to the time of death indicate that decisions about limiting life-prolonging treatment are often postponed until the patient's death is imminent.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsResuscitation OrdersCross-Sectional StudiesDeathHospitals, UniversityHumansRetrospective Studies“Do not resuscitate” ordersend-of-life carepalliative medicinetreatment limitations

Identifiers

PMID35699950
PMCPMC9544634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.