ArticleSpine deformity2022
Cellular immunophenotype of major spine surgery in adults.
Article in Spine deformity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examination of DNAm PhenoAge as an epigenetic biomarker for perioperative risk in adult spinal deformity surgeries.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal biomarkers in health and disease: implications for the aging spine-a review for spinal surgeons by the SRS adult spinal deformity task force on senescence.Spine deformity · 2025Review
- Immune biomarkers for predicting postoperative pneumonia following hip fracture surgery.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Geriatric Surgery Produces a Hypoactive Molecular Phenotype in the Monocyte Immune Gene Transcriptome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeASD reconstructions are a major, sterile traumatic insult, likely causing perturbations to the immune systems. The immune response to surgery is associated with outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine for a detectable immune signature associated with ASD surgery.
methodsConsecutive patients undergoing ASD surgery were approached and enrolled. Peripheral blood was drawn before incision, 4 h after, and 24 h after incision. Blood was stabilized and comprehensive flow cytometric immunophenotyping performed. Leukocyte population frequency, absolute number and activation marker expression were defined. Immunologic features were defined and analyzed by hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA). Changes over time were evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA (RMANOVA) and were corrected for a 1% false discovery rate. Post hoc testing was by Dunn's test. p values of < = 0.05 were considered significant.
resultsThirteen patients were enrolled; 11(85%) F, 65.4 years (± 7.5), surgical duration 418 ± 83 min, EBL 1928 ± 1253 mL. Hierarchical clustering and PCA found consistent time from incision-dependent changes. HLA-DR and activating co-stimulatory molecule CD86 were depressed at 4 h and furthermore at 24 h on monocyte surfaces. CD4 + HLA-DR + T cells, but not CD8 +, increased over time with increased expression of PD-1 at 4 and 24 h.
conclusionsDespite surgery and patient heterogeneity, we identified an immune signature associated with the sterile trauma of ASD surgery. Circulating leukocyte populations change in composition and signaling protein expression after incision and persisting to 24 h after incision, suggesting an immunocompromised state. Further work may determine relationships between this state and poor outcomes after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35699911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.