ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2022
Genomic analysis of an aggressive case with metastatic intrahepatic mucinous cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of genetic mutations in bladder cancers that arose following radiotherapy for prostate cancer with those in primary bladder cancers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endocervical adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary component: a clinicopathologic analysis in the setting of current WHO classification.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary duct cancer and biomarkers exploration.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intrahepatic mucinous cholangiocarcinoma (IHMC) is rare and behaves notoriously; however, the details of the clinicopathological characteristics of IHMC remain unknown. A 70-year-old man was admitted for examination of the hepatic mass in the S1 segment. He underwent extended left hepatic lobectomy. Histopathological evaluation demonstrated mixed papillary carcinoma that comprised well to moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma with large amounts of mucus lakes. Tumor was relapsed 9 months after surgery. Although he received chemotherapy with the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin, he had renal failure and discontinued the chemotherapy. He received palliative radiotherapy for metastasis in the cervical spine. Then, the patient treated with S-1, however, he died 16 months after the initial diagnosis. The autopsy findings showed multiple nodules in the lungs, pleura, kidneys, adrenal glands, stomach, pancreas, and lymph nodes. Histological examination revealed that all nodules were IHMC. Next-generation sequencing revealed that somatic mutations in ADGRB3, TAF1L and EPHA3 may affect carcinogenesis, and those in TAF1, EPHA3, PIK3C2B, FN1, ERBB3, BRIP1, SYNE1 and TGFBR2 may affect metastasis. Molecular carcinogenesis of IHMC may be distinct from that of ordinary cholangiocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to elucidate the genetic mutations and their functions in IHMC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.