Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35699836›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2022

Percutaneous Management of Breast Cancer: a Systematic Review.

Yuqing Dai, Ping Liang, Jie Yu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuqing DaiDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical College & Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
Ping LiangDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical College & Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China. liangping301@hotmail.com.
Jie YuDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical College & Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China. jiemi301@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-8766
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSurgical treatment of breast cancer is becoming increasingly more minimally invasive. We review the development status of percutaneous management for primary breast cancer and the evidence relating to tumor size as a fundamental determinant of treatment clinical outcome. RECENT

findingsIt is safe and feasible for percutaneous management to treat breast cancer. For tumor size ≤ 2 cm, percutaneous management is a promising alternative modality. For tumor size ≤ 3 cm, it is controversial whether percutaneous management can achieve similar effects to surgery, especially its long-term effects. For tumor size > 3 cm, it is still in the initial exploration stage and showed the potential in the treatment of unresectable cancer by benefitting the local control of primary cancer. Percutaneous management of breast cancer is a valuable method for breast cancer treatment in selected patients. However, it will be necessary to provide the high level of evidence for widespread clinical application.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCatheter AblationFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeAblation techniquesBreastCarcinomaCryosurgeryhigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablationLaser therapyRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID35699836
OpenAlexW4282836032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.