ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022
Evaluation of Aptamer Fluorescence Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The application of aptamer in tuberculosis diagnosis: a systematic review.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024Review
- Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Current, Ongoing, and Future Approaches.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Rapid detection ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Research of childhood tuberculosis in suspected populations by molecular methods: A multicenter study in China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis has stood the test of time. However, due to its low sensitivity, the positive detection rate for tuberculosis in clinical specimens is not high. To improve the sensitivity of microscopic observation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection, we developed the MTB-specific aptamer MA1. To further improve the binding reactivity of MA1 with MTB, we constructed a new derivative aptamer with a pocket-stem-loop-structure, MA1-39, and identified it to have high binding reactivity with the MTB reference strain. We developed an aptamer fluorescence microscopy test for MTB based on MA1-39 and evaluated its feasibility for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis. Among 56 tested strains, MA1-39 was proven to effectively discriminate MTB from the control strains, including 12 non-tuberculosis mycobacterial (NTM) reference strains, 6 NTM isolates, and 7 other bacteria. Next, this approach was applied to 169 clinical sputum samples from suspected tuberculosis patients and non-tuberculosis controls. Molecular tests together with both clinical and bacteriological identification were used as a protocol to evaluate the efficacy of aptamer detection. Compared with the traditional acid-fast staining light microscope, the aptamer fluorescence microscope showed a higher detection rate for MTB in clinical specimens (48.8% versus 32.6%), and the specificities of the two techniques had almost no significant difference (90.4% versus 94%). In addition, aptamer fluorescence microscopy showed the same positive predictive value (PPV) as staining (84% versus 84.9%), but a higher negative predictive value (NPV; 63% versus 57.3%). In conclusion, the newly established aptamer fluorescence microscopy approach is likely to be a feasible method for microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.