Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35699430›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.

Huaipan Jiang, Jian Wang, Weilin Cong, Yihe Huang, Morteza Ramezani, Anup Sarma, Nikolay V Dokholyan, Mehrdad Mahdavi, Mahmut T Kandemir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Building Explainable Graph Neural Network by Sparse Learning for the Drug-Protein Binding Prediction.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Drug Discovery and Design through Computational Innovations.Current computer-aided drug design · 2025
    Article
  13. Improved Prediction of Ligand-Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huaipan JiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-1611
Jian WangDepartments of Pharmacology and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-2802
Weilin CongDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-3238
Yihe HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-1170
Morteza RamezaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-5522
Anup SarmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-4498
Nikolay V DokholyanDepartments of Pharmacology and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-4025
Mehrdad MahdaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2679-6679
Mahmut T KandemirDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9940-9951

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Nanoscale programming of cellular and physiological phenotypes: EquipmentR35GM134864 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Nikolay Dokholyan · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Discovery of functionally selective dopamine ligands for age-related cognitive declineRF1AG071675 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY, MAILMAN, RICHARD B · 2021 to 2021
$1.5M
Discovery of functionally selective dopamine ligands for age-related cognitive declineR01AG071675 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY, MAILMAN, RICHARD B · 2024 to 2025
$968k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071675NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG071675NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern day drug discovery is extremely expensive and time consuming. Although computational approaches help accelerate and decrease the cost of drug discovery, existing computational software packages for docking-based drug discovery suffer from both low accuracy and high latency. A few recent machine learning-based approaches have been proposed for virtual screening by improving the ability to evaluate protein-ligand binding affinity, but such methods rely heavily on conventional docking software to sample docking poses, which results in excessive execution latencies. Here, we propose and evaluate a novel graph neural network (GNN)-based framework, MedusaGraph, which includes both pose-prediction (sampling) and pose-selection (scoring) models. Unlike the previous machine learning-centric studies, MedusaGraph generates the docking poses directly and achieves from 10 to 100 times speedup compared to state-of-the-art approaches, while having a slightly better docking accuracy.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35699430
PMCPMC10279412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.