ArticlePublic understanding of science (Bristol, England)2022
Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies.
Article in Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-reported availability of research data in American Psychological Association journal articles: a cross-sectional investigation.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Funders' Expectations for Open Science in Cardiovascular Research: A Scoping Review of the Largest Cardiovascular Research Funders.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Shedding light on public perceptions of scientists who engage in wrongness admission amidst a failed replication.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Open Science in Undergraduate Medical Education: An International Framework for Transparency, Responsibility, and Professional Identity Formation.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Advancing MRI, together: open science in MR research.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for good model-sharing practices.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Expectations of Katowice residents regarding the program assumptions of the European city of science Katowice 2024 in the field of medical and health sciences - questionnaire survey results.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Recognizing and marshalling the pre-publication error correction potential of open data for more reproducible science.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Reply to: Recognizing and marshalling the pre-publication error correction potential of open data for more reproducible science.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Iranian researchers' perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In two studies, we examined whether open science practices, such as making materials, data, and code of a study openly accessible, positively affect public trust in science. Furthermore, we investigated whether the potential trust-damaging effects of research being funded privately (e.g. by a commercial enterprise) may be buffered by such practices. After preregistering six hypotheses, we conducted a survey study (Study 1;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.