Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35699170›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization: Insights From VOYAGER PAD.

Connie N Hess, Iris Baumgartner, Sonia S Anand, Mark R Nehler, Manesh R Patel, E Sebastian Debus, Michael Szarek, Warren Capell, Eva Muehlhofer, Scott D Berkowitz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Parity in Patency? Efficacy of Resorbable Scaffold by Sex in LIFE-BTK.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Sex and Racial Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Connie N HessDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.ORCID 0000-0002-5830-0511
Iris BaumgartnerDivision of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.
Sonia S AnandPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-7441
Mark R NehlerCPC Clinical Research Aurora CO.
Manesh R PatelDivision of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.ORCID 0000-0002-2393-0855
E Sebastian DebusDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Vascular Surgery - Angiology - Endovascular Therapy University of Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-6439
Michael SzarekDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.
Warren CapellCPC Clinical Research Aurora CO.
Eva MuehlhoferBayer AG, Research & Development Wuppertal Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-232X
Scott D BerkowitzCPC Clinical Research Aurora CO.ORCID 0000-0002-9428-4408
Lloyd P HaskellJanssen Research and Development Raritan NJ.
Rupert M BauersachsCCB-Cardiovascular Center Bethanien Frankfurt Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-1741
Marc P BonacaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-3584
Judith HsiaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.ORCID 0000-0002-3413-7836
University of Colorado Denver · USBayer (Germany) · DEClinical Research Institute · USJanssen (United States) · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPopulation Health Research Institute · CAState University of New York · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Despite high female prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), little is known about sex-based outcomes after lower extremity revascularization (LER) for symptomatic PAD. The effects of rivaroxaban according to sex following LER have not been fully reported. Methods and Results In VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease), low-dose rivaroxaban versus placebo on a background of aspirin reduced the composite primary efficacy outcome of cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD undergoing LER. Unplanned index limb revascularization was prespecified and prospectively ascertained. The primary safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. Analyses of outcomes and treatment effects by sex were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 6564 randomly assigned patients followed for a median of 28 months, 1704 (26.0%) were women. Among patients administered placebo, women were at similar risk for the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; [95% CI, 0.74-1.09];

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresPeripheral Arterial DiseaseArteriesAspirinFemaleHemorrhageHumansLower ExtremityMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk FactorsRivaroxabanTreatment OutcomeAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRivaroxabanoutcomesperipheral artery diseaserevascularizationsex

Identifiers

PMID35699170
PMCPMC9238670
OpenAlexW4282927581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.