Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698823›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2022

Satisfaction of outpatient oncologists with their work.

Liudmila Moskvicheva, Sergey Russkikh, Ekaterina Makarova, Elena A Tarasenko, Mikhail D Vasiliev, Alina B Timurzieva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liudmila MoskvichevaUltrasound Diagnostic Department, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow. ludamed16@mail.ru.
Sergey RusskikhN.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow Russia;(3) Department of Theory and Practice of Public Administration, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow. russkikh1@mail.ru.
Ekaterina MakarovaN.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow Russia; Research Laboratory "Health Technology Assessment and Clinical and Economic Expertise" A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow. baudolinoo@gmail.com.
Elena A TarasenkoDepartment of Health Management and Economics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow. etarasenko@hse.ru.
Mikhail D VasilievN.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow. m.vasilev@nriph.ru.
Alina B TimurzievaN.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health, Moscow. alinko9977z@mail.ru.
National Research Institute of Public Health named after N.A. Semashko · RUNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUMinistry of Health · ESMoscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Job satisfaction is a fundamental ingredient in the life quality of a modern person; for a health care worker, it determines to a large extent the quality and accessibility of health care services they provide. Our aim is identification of key reasons for low job satisfaction among outpatient oncologists at cancer care centres (CCC) and identification of the best ways to address them. 110 oncologists working in outpatient CCC in Moscow, Moscow region and Ivanovo region participated in this research. Respondents' job satisfaction was assessed using V.A. Rozanova's Job Satisfaction Assessment Questionnaire. Virtually a quarter (23.6%) of oncologists were dissatisfied with their work; male respondents and surgical employees reported significantly higher levels of dissatisfaction. Wage levels and equity, working hours, teamwork and coordination in carrying out collective tasks and managerial style were the main areas of dissatisfaction. Measures to improve the work process included enhancing the resource outfit, fair consideration of each employee's achievements when distributing incentives, clear allocation of responsibility for collective project tasks, creating opportunities for paid part-time work and arranging regular meals at the expense of the health care organisation. Raising managers' awareness of the results can contribute to improvements in oncologists' performance, work process satisfaction, productivity and performance, quality of care and access to it, as well as public satisfaction and confidence in the health-care system as a whole.

Identifiers

PMID35698823
PMCPMC9295165
OpenAlexW4281767183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.