Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698673›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Optic Disc Edema and Elevated Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Comprehensive Review of Papilledema.

Louis Reier, James B Fowler, Mohammad Arshad, Hamid Hadi, Eric Whitney, Anthony V Farmah, Javed Siddiqi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Transorbital point-of-care ultrasound versus fundoscopic papilledema to support treatment indication for potentially elevated intracranial pressure in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Etiologies of papilledema in Cameroonian hospitals].The Pan African medical journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis ReierNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
James B FowlerNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Mohammad ArshadNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Hamid HadiNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Eric WhitneyNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Anthony V FarmahNeurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Javed SiddiqiNeurosurgery, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, USA.
Desert Regional Medical Center · USRiverside University Health System - Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papilledema is a swelling of the optic disc secondary to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). We analyzed 79 peer-review journal articles and provided a concise summary of the etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, evaluation, natural history, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of papilledema. Only studies written in English with the full text available were included. Although many etiologies of papilledema exist, idiopathic intracranial hypertension is the most common and, thus, a large focus of this review.

Indexed as

benign intracranial hypertensionintracranial idiopathic hypertensionoptic disc swellingpapilledemapseudotumor cerebri syndrome (ptcs)

Identifiers

PMID35698673
PMCPMC9187153
OpenAlexW4280514300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.