ArticleBiomicrofluidics2022
Microfluidic cell sorter sample preparation for genomic assays.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterogeneity of the adult mammalian forebrain neurogenic ependyma: A comprehensive cellular map.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Essential Fluidics for a Flow Cytometer.Current protocols · 2024Article
- Thermal inkjet makes label-free single-cell proteomics accessible and easy.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Purification of retinal ganglion cells using low-pressure flow cytometry.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-Sequencing has led to many novel discoveries such as the detection of rare cell populations, microbial populations, and cancer mutations. The quality of single-cell transcriptomics relies heavily on sample preparation and cell sorting techniques that best preserve RNA quality while removing dead cells or debris prior to cDNA generation and library preparation. Magnetic bead cell enrichment is a simple process of cleaning up a sample but can only separate on a single-criterion. Droplet-based cell sorters, on the other hand, allows for higher purity of sorted cells gated on several fluorescent and scatter properties. The downside of traditional droplet-based sorters is their operational complexity, accessibility, and potential stress on cells due to their high-pressure pumps. The WOLF
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.