Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698622›Full record

ArticlePlant and soil2022

Evaluating the rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial microbiome of pioneering pines in an aggregate mining ecosystem post-disturbance.

Kiran Preet Padda, Akshit Puri, Nguyen Khoi Nguyen, Timothy J Philpott, Chris P Chanway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant and soil, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiran Preet PaddaDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Akshit PuriPresent Address: School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-6369
Nguyen Khoi NguyenMicrobiome Insights Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Timothy J PhilpottBritish Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Williams Lake, BC Canada.
Chris P ChanwayDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Despite little soil development and organic matter accumulation, lodgepole pine ( Methods: We characterized the diversity, taxonomic composition, and relative abundance of bacterial communities in rhizosphere and endosphere niches of pine trees regenerating at the gravel pit along with comparing them with a nearby undisturbed forested site using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. Additionally, the soil and plant nutrient contents at both sites were also analyzed. Results: Although soil N-content at the gravel pit was drastically lower than the forest site, pine tissue N-levels at both sites were identical. Beta-diversity was affected by site and niche-type, signifying that the diversity of bacterial communities harboured by pine trees was different between both sites and among various plant-niches. Bacterial alpha-diversity was comparable at both sites but differed significantly between belowground and aboveground plant-niches. In terms of composition, pine trees predominantly associated with taxa that appear plant-beneficial including phylotypes of Conclusions: Our results suggest that, following mining activity, regenerating pine trees recruit bacterial communities that could be plant-beneficial and support pine growth in an otherwise severely N-limited disturbed environment. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11104-022-05327-2.

Indexed as

Acetic acid bacteriaEndophytesNitrogenPinusRhizobialesTree microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35698622
PMCPMC9184430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.