ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Physical function and health-related quality of life of community-dwelling older adults with locomotive syndrome and pre-frailty.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Percent Body Fat with Balance, Gait, and Locomotive Syndrome Risk in Community-dwelling Older Women.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To consider the effective rehabilitation approaches for locomotive syndrome (LS) and pre-frailty, we examined the characteristics of physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in community-dwelling older adults. [Participants and Methods] Eighty-three individuals (age 71.8 ± 5.5 years, 29 males and 54 females) were divided into robust (R), LS, and locomotive syndrome with pre-frailty (LSP) groups. We compared the subscale and summary scores of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as HRQoL indices. The grip strength, five-chair stand up test (SS-5), and normal walking speed were the physical function indices. [Results] The LS group had lower two-step scores and normal walking speed but there was no significant difference in the SF-36. The two-step score and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale, SS-5, seven SF-36 subscales, and mental component summary (MCS) scores were lower in the LSP group. Compared to that of the LS group, the LSP group did not show significant difference in physical function but showed lower values in overall health, vitality, mental health, and MCS in the SF-36 subscales. [Conclusion] The subjective evaluation of one's health was lower than that of the deterioration of physical function as a characteristic of the LSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.