ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Clinical reliability and usability of smartphone goniometers for hip range of motion measurement.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of Kinovea for the Kinematic Analysis of Squatting in Healthy Active Women.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of preoperative nutritional impairment on physical function early after total hip arthroplasty.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of TecnoBody D-Wall to Assess the Range of Motion During Overhead Squat in Healthy Individuals.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validity and Reliability of POM-Checker for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Healthy Participants: A Pilot Single-Center Comparative Study.Methods and protocols · 2023Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Novel Smartphone Tele-Assessment Solution for Quantifying Hip Range of Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to utilize the objective measurements and a survey questionnaire for assessing the intra- and inter-rater reliability, measurement time, and usability of a smartphone application type of goniometer to measure the hip joint angles. [Participants and Methods] Three examiners (physiotherapists) measured the hip joint range of motion using universal and smartphone goniometers on 30 daycare center rehabilitation patients. Reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient. The examiners completed a questionnaire survey for assessing the usability of the goniometers. [Results] The intra-rater reliability was high, but the inter-rater reliability was low. Measurement times using the two instruments showed no difference. The usability questionnaire findings suggested that the smartphone goniometer was easier to use than the universal goniometer. [Conclusion] Reliability within the raters was high, but reliability among the raters was low. However, both goniometric devices provided a satisfactory range of motion measurement data when a single evaluator used the same device for all measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.