Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698542›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2022

Dosimetric Evaluation of the Treatment Plan on Indigenous Heterogeneous Phantoms using Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm and Acuros-XB Algorithm for Different Photon Energies.

Vinod Kumar Gangwar, Om Prakash Gurjar, Lalit Kumar, Avinash Agarwal, Vineet Kumar Mishra, Surendra Prasad Mishra, Saket Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vinod Kumar GangwarPhD Candidate, Department of Physics, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly Uttar Pradesh, India.
Om Prakash GurjarPhD, Government Cancer Hospital, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore-452001, India.
Lalit KumarPhD, Department of Applied Science & Humanities, Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, India.
Avinash AgarwalPhD, Department of Physics Bareilly College Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vineet Kumar MishraMSc, Apollomedics Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Surendra Prasad MishraPhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ram Manohar Lohia Medical sciences Lucknow, India.
Saket PandeyMD, Medical Physics Division amp Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollomedics Hospital, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Modern radiotherapy techniques are using advanced algorithms; however, phantoms used for quality assurance have homogeneous density; accordingly, the development of heterogeneous phantom mimicking human body sites is imperative to examine variation between planned and delivered doses. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of planned dose by different algorithms using indigenously developed heterogeneous thoracic phantom (HT). Material and Methods: In this experimental study, computed tomography (CT) of HT was done, and the density of different parts was measured. The plan was generated on CT images of HCP with 6 and 15 Megavoltage (MV) photon beams using different treatment techniques, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Plans were delivered by the linear accelerator, and the dose was measured using the ion chamber (IC) placed in HT; planned and measured doses were compared. Results: Density patterns for different parts of the fabricated phantom, including rib, spine, scapula, lung, chest wall, and heart were 1.849, 1.976, 1.983, 0.173, 0.855, and 0.833 g/cc, respectively. Variation between planned and IC estimated doses with the tolerance (±5%) for all photon energies using different techniques. Acuros-XB (AXB) showed a slightly higher variation between computed and IC estimated doses using HCP compared to the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA). Conclusion: The indigenous heterogeneous phantom can accurately simulate the dosimetric scenario for different algorithms (AXB or AAA) and be also utilized for routine patient-specific QA.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed TomographyHuman BodyLung PhantomsRibsVolumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy

Identifiers

PMID35698542
PMCPMC9175120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.