Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698245›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2022

Comparative Evaluation of Light-Driven Catalysis: A Framework for Standardized Reporting of Data.

Dirk Ziegenbalg, Andrea Pannwitz, Sven Rau, Benjamin Dietzek-Ivanšić, Carsten Streb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Photocatalytic Biohybrid Vesicles.Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The ZrChemSusChem · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dirk ZiegenbalgInstitute of Chemical Engineering, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-4953
Andrea PannwitzInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-0730
Sven RauInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Benjamin Dietzek-IvanšićInstitute of Physical Chemistry and Center of Energy and Environmental Chemistry Jena (CEEC Jena), Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Helmholtzweg 4, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Carsten StrebInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-1905

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 364549901; 359737763; 404382951; 404530119Vector Stiftung P2019-0110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-driven homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis require a complex interplay between light absorption, charge separation, charge transfer, and catalytic turnover. Optical and irradiation parameters as well as reaction engineering aspects play major roles in controlling catalytic performance. This multitude of factors makes it difficult to objectively compare light-driven catalysts and provide an unbiased performance assessment. This Scientific Perspective highlights the importance of collecting and reporting experimental data in homogeneous and heterogeneous light-driven catalysis. A critical analysis of the benefits and limitations of the commonly used experimental indicators is provided. Data collection and reporting according to FAIR principles is discussed in the context of future automated data analysis. The authors propose a minimum dataset as a basis for unified collecting and reporting of experimental data in homogeneous and heterogeneous light-driven catalysis. The community is encouraged to support the future development of this parameter list through an open online repository.

Indexed as

ComparabilityHeterogeneousHomogeneousLight-Driven CatalysisPhotocatalysis

Identifiers

PMID35698245
PMCPMC9401044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.