Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698217›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Antecedents of unfinished nursing care: a systematic review of the literature.

Stefania Chiappinotto, Evridiki Papastavrou, Georgios Efstathiou, Panayiota Andreou, Renate Stemmer, Christina Ströhm, Maria Schubert, Susanne de Wolf-Linder, Jessica Longhini, Alvisa Palese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefania ChiappinottoUniversity of Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Evridiki PapastavrouDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Georgios EfstathiouDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Panayiota AndreouMedical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Renate StemmerCatholic University of Applied Sciences, Mainz, Germany.
Christina StröhmCatholic University of Applied Sciences, Mainz, Germany.
Maria SchubertSchool of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Science, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Susanne de Wolf-LinderSchool of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Science, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Jessica LonghiniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. alvisa.palese@uniud.it.

Funding

Erasmus+ programme of the European Union - NM4SAFETY - KA203 Erasmus+ programme of the European Union - NM4SAFETY - KA203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnfinished Nursing Care (UNC) concept, that express the condition when nurses are forced to delay or omit required nursing care, has been largely investigated as tasks left undone, missed care, and implicit rationing of nursing care. However, no summary of the available evidence regarding UNC antecedents has been published. The aim of this study is to identify and summarise antecedents of UNC as documented in primary studies to date.

methodsA systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PROSPERO databases were searched for quantitative studies reporting the relationships between antecedents and UNC published after 2004 up to 21 January 2020. The reference lists of secondary studies have been scrutinised to identify additional studies. Two reviewers independently identified studies and evaluated them for their eligibility and disagreements were resolved by the research team. The quality appraisal was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools, according to the study designs. A data extraction grid was piloted and then used to extract data. The antecedents that emerged were thematically categorised with an inductive approach.

resultsFifty-eight studies were included; among them, 54 were cross-sectional, three were cohort studies, and one was a quasi-experimental study. They were conducted mainly in the United States and in hospital settings. The UNC antecedents have been investigated to date at the (a) unit (e.g., workloads, non-nursing tasks), (b) nurse (e.g., age, gender), and (c) patient levels (clinical instability).

conclusionsAt the unit level, it is highly recommended to provide an adequate staff level, strategies to deal with unpredictable workloads, and to promote good practice environments to reduce or minimise UNC. By contrast, at the nurse and patient levels, there were no clear trends regarding modifiable factors that could decrease the occurrence of UNC. The map of antecedents that emerged can be used to design interventional studies aimed at changing research from merely descriptive to that which evaluates the effectiveness of interventions.

Indexed as

AntecedentsFactorsImplicit of nursing careMissed nursing carePredictorsReasonsSystematic reviewTasks left undoneUnfinished nursing care

Identifiers

PMID35698217
PMCPMC9195215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.