Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698211›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Laboratory breeding of two Phortica species (Diptera: Drosophilidae), vectors of the zoonotic eyeworm Thelazia callipaeda.

Ilaria Bernardini, Cristiana Poggi, Sara Manzi, Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos, Frédéric Beugnet, Josephus Fourie, Domenico Otranto, Marco Pombi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Eye to eye withCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Distribution, identification and ecology ofInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilaria BernardiniDipartimento Di Malattie Infettive, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Cristiana PoggiDipartimento Di Sanità Pubblica E Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sara ManziDipartimento Di Sanità Pubblica E Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Marcos Antonio Bezerra-SantosDipartimento Di Medicina Veterinaria, Università Degli Studi Di Bari, Valenzano, Italy.
Frédéric BeugnetBoehringer-Ingelheim Animal Health, Lyon, France.
Josephus FourieClinVet International (Pty) Ltd, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Domenico OtrantoDipartimento Di Medicina Veterinaria, Università Degli Studi Di Bari, Valenzano, Italy.
Marco PombiDipartimento Di Sanità Pubblica E Malattie Infettive, Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy. marco.pombi@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-9922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome species of drosophilid flies belonging to the genus Phortica feed on ocular secretions of mammals, acting as biological vectors of the zoonotic eyeworm Thelazia callipaeda. This study describes an effective breeding protocol of Phortica variegata and Phortica oldenbergi in insectary conditions.

methodsAlive gravid flies of P. oldenbergi, P. variegata and Phortica semivirgo were field collected in wooded areas of Lazio region (Italy) and allowed to oviposit singularly to obtain isofamilies. Flies were maintained in ovipots (200 ml) with a plaster-covered bottom to maintain high humidity level inside. Adult feeding was guaranteed by fresh apples and a liquid dietary supplement containing sodium chloride and mucin proteins, while larval development was obtained by Drosophila-like agar feeding medium. The breeding performances of two media were compared: a standard one based on cornmeal flour and an enriched medium based on chestnut flour. All conditions were kept in a climatic chamber with a photoperiod of 14:10 h light:dark, 26 ± 2 °C and 80 ± 10% RH.

resultsFrom a total of 130 field-collected Phortica spp., three generations (i.e. F1 = 783, F2 = 109, F3 = 6) were obtained. Phortica oldenbergi was the species with highest breeding performance, being the only species reaching F3. Chestnut-based feeding medium allowed higher adult production and survival probability in both P. oldenbergi and P. variegata. Adult production/female was promising in both species (P. oldenbergi: 13.5 F1/f; P. variegata: 4.5 F1/f).

conclusionsThis standardized breeding protocol, based on controlled climatic parameters and fly densities, together with the introduction of an enriched chestnut-based feeding medium, allowed to investigate aspects of life history traits of Phortica spp. involved in the transmission of T. callipaeda. Obtaining F3 generation of these species for the first time paved the road for the establishment of stable colonies, an essential requirement for future studies on these vectors in controlled conditions.

Indexed as

DrosophilidaeEye Infections, ParasiticSpirurida InfectionsThelazioideaAnimalsBreedingDrosophilaFemaleLoaMammalsEyewormLaboratory rearingPhortica oldenbergiPhortica semivirgoPhortica variegataThelazia callipaedaVector-borne diseaseZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID35698211
PMCPMC9195204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.