Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698203›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in patients undergoing gastric and esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.

Xin Luo, Li-Xin An, Pei-Shan Chen, Xin-Lu Chang, Yang Li

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Li-Xin AnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. anlixin8120@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-4010
Pei-Shan ChenBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xin-Lu ChangBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Yang LiBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research CFH 2022-2-20210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used as an effective treatment of early gastric and esophageal tumors, as it is minimally invasive, safe, and convenient. Epigastric pain is a common complication of ESD. In the traditional cognition, the postoperative pain of ESD is not serious and does not attach too much attention. However, previous studies found that the incidence of moderate to severe pain after ESD can be as high as 44.9~62.8%. At present, there is no unified understanding of how to carry out good postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing ESD of stomach and esophagus. The purpose of present study is to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) using on postoperative pain though observing the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score within 48 h after ESD surgery, so as to explore an effective analgesia and anesthetic method in patients undergoing gastric and esophagus ESD. METHODS/

designThis study is a prospective, single-center, two-arm, randomized control trail. In total, 120 patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection were stratified by type of surgery (i.e., gastric or esophagus ESD) and randomized into two treatment groups, DEX group (group D, n = 60) and control group (group C, n = 60). Patients in the experimental group (DEX group) will be administrated a loading dose of DEX at 1 μg/kg for 15 min and a continuous infusion at 0.6 μg/kg/h until 30 min before the end of operation. In control group, the same volume of normal saline was infused. The primary outcome is VAS at 2 h after ESD surgery. The secondary outcome will be VAS at 1 h, 4 h, 6 h,18 h, 24 h, and 48 h, the status of perioperative hemodynamics, the use of remedial analgesics, sedation score, shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and satisfaction scores of patient and complication of ESD (such as bleeding, perforation, aspiration pneumonia). DISCUSSION: The results of this study will demonstrate that intraoperative application of DEX is beneficial for postoperative pain treatment in patients undergoing ESD. This study will not only confirm that postoperative pain treatment is necessary for patients undergoing ESD but also provides an effective anesthesia method for postoperative analgesia.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ChiCTR2100043837 , registered on March 4, 2021, http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodEsophagusHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStomachTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDexmedetomidineDexmedetomidineEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)Postoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID35698203
PMCPMC9195240
OpenAlexW4282560970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.