Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698201›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

Comparison of 6-month outcomes of sepsis versus non-sepsis critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Carol L Hodgson, Alisa M Higgins, Michael Bailey, Jonathon Barrett, Rinaldo Bellomo, D James Cooper, Belinda J Gabbe, Theodore Iwashyna, Natalie Linke, Paul S Myles and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03226912 (The PREDICT Study- a Registry in Critically Ill Patients to Determine Predictors of Disability Free Survival), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03226912 completednot on this map

The PREDICT Study- a Registry in Critically Ill Patients to Determine Predictors of Disability Free Survival

TypeobservationalSponsorAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreRan2017 to 2020Enrolled500ConditionsCritical Illness, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Disabilities Multiple, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trajectories of sepsis survivors in Australia: A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Carol L HodgsonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. carol.hodgson@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9002-2075
Alisa M HigginsAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Michael BaileyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Jonathon BarrettIntensive Care Unit, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1650-8939
D James CooperAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5872-9051
Belinda J GabbeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Theodore IwashynaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Natalie LinkeAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Paul S MylesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michelle PatonAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Steve PhilpotIntensive Care Unit, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mark ShulmanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Meredith YoungDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ary Serpa NetoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
PREDICT Study Investigators
Monash University · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUCabrini Hospital · AUEpworth Hospital · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUMonash Health · AUUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on long-term outcomes after sepsis-associated critical illness have mostly come from small cohort studies, with no information about the incidence of new disability. We investigated whether sepsis-associated critical illness was independently associated with new disability at 6 months after ICU admission compared with other types of critical illness.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study in six metropolitan intensive care units in Australia. Adult patients were eligible if they had been admitted to the ICU and received more than 24 h of mechanical ventilation. There was no intervention.

resultsThe primary outcome was new disability measured with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) 12 level score compared between baseline and 6 months. Between enrollment and follow-up at 6 months, 222/888 (25%) patients died, 100 (35.5%) with sepsis and 122 (20.1%) without sepsis (P < 0.001). Among survivors, there was no difference for the incidence of new disability at 6 months with or without sepsis, 42/106 (39.6%) and 106/300 (35.3%) (RD, 0.00 (- 10.29 to 10.40), P = 0.995), respectively. In addition, there was no difference in the severity of disability, health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, return to work, financial distress or cognitive function.

conclusionsCompared to mechanically ventilated patients of similar acuity and length of stay without sepsis, patients with sepsis admitted to ICU have an increased risk of death, but survivors have a similar risk of new disability at 6 months. Trial registration NCT03226912, registered July 24, 2017.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSepsisAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRespiration, ArtificialCritical illnessDisabilityIntensive careMechanical ventilationRecoverySepsis

Identifiers

PMID35698201
PMCPMC9189265
OpenAlexW4282546746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.