Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698084›Full record

ReviewBiology direct2022

Total neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic minireview.

Andrea M Guida, Bruno Sensi, Vincenzo Formica, Rolando M D'Angelillo, Mario Roselli, Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco, Piero Rossi, Gabriella T Capolupo, Marco Caricato, Giuseppe S Sica

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physical fitness and body composition assessments in advanced cancer patients undergoing exenterative surgery - A pilot cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea M GuidaDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-6956
Bruno SensiDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1912-2414
Vincenzo FormicaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-3144
Rolando M D'AngelilloDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Radiation Oncology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-6429
Mario RoselliDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2431-6689
Giovanna Del Vecchio BlancoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6327-563X
Piero RossiDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6523-636X
Gabriella T CapolupoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-8180
Marco CaricatoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-1615
Giuseppe S SicaDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy. sigisica@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7407-0584
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and indeed, rectal cancer accounting for approximately one third of newly diagnosed patients. Gold standard in the treatment of rectal cancer is a multimodality approach, aiming at a good control of the local disease. Distant recurrences are the major cause of mortality. Currently, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) patients undergo a combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery. Eventually, more chemotherapy, namely adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), may be necessary. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is an emerging approach aimed to reduce distant metastases and improve local control. Several ongoing studies are analyzing whether this new approach could improve oncological outcomes. Published results were encouraging, but the heterogeneity of protocols in use, makes the comparison and interpretation of data rather complex. One of the major concerns regarding TNT administration is related to its effect on larger and more advanced cancers that might not undergo similar down-staging as smaller, early-stage tumors. This minireview, based on a systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis, summarizes current knowledge on TNT. The aim was to confirm or refute whether or not current practice of TNT is based on relevant evidence, to establish the quality of that evidence, and to address any uncertainty or variation in practice that may be occurring. A tentative grouping of general study characteristics, clinical features and treatments characteristics has been undertaken to evaluate if the reported studies are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of subjects involved, interventions, and outcomes to provide a meaningful idea of which patients are more likely to gain from this treatment.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm StagingLocally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC)Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyPathological Complete Response (pCR)Rectal cancerTotal Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT)Tumor Regression Grade (TRG)

Identifiers

PMID35698084
PMCPMC9195214
OpenAlexW4282591834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.