Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698070›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2022

Galcanezumab effect on "whole pain burden" and multidimensional outcomes in migraine patients with previous unsuccessful treatments: a real-world experience.

Marcello Silvestro, Alessandro Tessitore, Ilaria Orologio, Rosa De Micco, Lorenzo Tartaglione, Francesca Trojsi, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Antonio Russo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, migraine and mood disorders: an observational study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Psychopathological variables in chronic migraine patients with different therapeutic approach: psychological profile differences and impact on therapeutic efficacy in real life.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Multimodal digital health treatments for Chronic Migraine associated with Medication Overuse Headache: a literature appraisal and results of a single-arm open trial (the BE-HOME program).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcello SilvestroHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro TessitoreHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Ilaria OrologioHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Rosa De MiccoHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo TartaglioneHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Francesca TrojsiHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Gioacchino TedeschiHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy.
Antonio RussoHeadache Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2 - I-80138, Naples, Italy. dottor.russo@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials have demonstrated galcanezumab as safe and effective in migraine prevention. However, real-life data are still lacking and overlook the impact of galcanezumab on those different migraine facets strongly contributing to migraine burden. Herein we report the clinical experience from an Italian real-world setting using galcanezumab in patients with migraine experiencing previous unsuccessful preventive treatments.

methodsForty-three patients with migraine and failure of at least 3 migraine preventive medication classes received monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. At the first administration and after 3 and 6 months, patients underwent extensive interviews to assess clinical parameters of disease severity. Furthermore, validated questionnaires were administered to explore migraine-related disability, impact, and quality of life as well as symptoms of depression or anxiety, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality and the ictal cutaneous allodynia.

resultsAfter the third and the sixth administration of monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c., headache attacks frequency reduced from 20.56 to 7.44 and 6.37 headache days per month, respectively. Moreover, a significant improvement in headache pain intensity (from 8.95 to 6.84 and 6.21) and duration (from 9.03 to 3.75 and 2.38) as well as in scores assessing migraine related disability and impact, depressive and anxious symptoms, and pain catastrophizing was observed. Furthermore, we demonstrated a significant reduction in the values of "whole pain burden", a composite score derived from the product of the average of headache frequency, intensity, and duration in the last three months.

conclusionReal-world data support monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. as a safe and effective preventive treatment in reducing headache frequency, intensity, and duration as well as comorbid depressive or anxious symptoms, pain catastrophizing and quality of life in both episodic and chronic migraine patients with previous unsuccessful preventive treatments. Furthermore, we demonstrated that monthly galcanezumab 120 mg s.c. is able to induce a significant improvement in the scores of "whole pain burden". The latter is a reliable and easy-to-handle tool to be employed in clinical setting to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive drugs (in this case, galcanezumab) or when the decision of continuing the treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs is mandatory.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersQuality of LifeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHeadacheHumansPainTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedgalcanezumabCGRPGalcanezumabMigraineMonoclonal antibodiesReal-world

Identifiers

PMID35698070
PMCPMC9195341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.