Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35698053›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Do intentions lead to action? Results of a longitudinal study assessing determinants of Tdap vaccine uptake during pregnancy in Quebec, Canada.

Eve Dubé, Marie-Eve Trottier, Maryline Vivion, Manale Ouakki, Nicholas Brousseau, Maryse Guay, Zineb Laghdir, Isabelle Boucoiran, Bruce Tapiéro, Caroline Quach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eve DubéDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Eve Dubé, 2400 D'Estimauville, Québec, QC, G1E 7G9, Canada. eve.dube@inspq.qc.ca.
Marie-Eve TrottierDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Eve Dubé, 2400 D'Estimauville, Québec, QC, G1E 7G9, Canada.
Maryline VivionDirection de la valorisation scientifique et qualité, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Québec City, Qc, Canada.
Manale OuakkiDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Eve Dubé, 2400 D'Estimauville, Québec, QC, G1E 7G9, Canada.
Nicholas BrousseauDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Eve Dubé, 2400 D'Estimauville, Québec, QC, G1E 7G9, Canada.
Maryse GuayDirection des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec, Eve Dubé, 2400 D'Estimauville, Québec, QC, G1E 7G9, Canada.
Zineb LaghdirCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Isabelle BoucoiranCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Bruce TapiéroInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Caroline QuachCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Qc, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, vaccination against pertussis (Tdap) during pregnancy has been recommended since 2018, with suboptimal uptake. We aimed to assess the determinants of intention and uptake of Tdap vaccine among pregnant women in Quebec.

methodsParticipants (< 21 weeks of pregnancy) were recruited in four Quebec regions. Two online surveys were administered during pregnancy (< 21 weeks and > 35 weeks). One measured vaccination intention and the other assessed the actual decision. Questionnaires were informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). We used logistic multivariate analysis to identify determinants of Tdap vaccination uptake during pregnancy using responses to both questionnaires.

resultsA total of 741 women answered the first survey and 568 (76.7%), the second survey. In the first survey most participants intended to receive the Tdap vaccine during their pregnancy (76.3%) and in the second survey, 82.4% reported having been vaccinated against Tdap during their pregnancy. In multivariate analysis, the main determinants of vaccine uptake were: a recommendation from a healthcare provider (OR = 7.6), vaccine intention (OR = 6.12), social norms (or thinking that most pregnant women will be vaccinated (OR = 3.81), recruitment site (OR = 3.61 for General Family Medicine unit) perceived behavioral control (or low perceived barriers to access vaccination services, (OR = 2.32) and anticipated feeling of guilt if not vaccinated (OR = 2.13). Safety concerns were the main reason for not intending or not receiving the vaccine during pregnancy.

conclusionWe observed high vaccine acceptance and uptake of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy. The core components of the TPB (intention, social norms and perceived behavioral control) were all predictors of vaccine uptake, but our multivariate analysis also showed that other determinants were influential: being sufficiently informed about Tdap vaccination, not having vaccine safety concerns, and anticipated regret if unvaccinated. To ensure high vaccine acceptance and uptake in pregnancy, strong recommendations by trusted healthcare providers and ease of access to vaccination services remain instrumental.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesWhooping CoughFemaleHumansIntentionLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyQuebecVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesImmunizationKnowledge, attitudesPertussisPregnancyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35698053
PMCPMC9189261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.