Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697974›Full record

ArticleThe patient2022

Patient Medication Preferences for Managing Dry Eye Disease: The Importance of Medication Side Effects.

Semra Ozdemir, Sharon Wan Jie Yeo, Jia Jia Lee, Adithya Bhaskar, Eric Finkelstein, Louis Tong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Semra OzdemirSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. semra.ozdemir@duke-nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0001-7556-1601
Sharon Wan Jie YeoOcular Surface Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Jia LeeSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Adithya BhaskarSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Eric FinkelsteinSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Louis TongOcular Surface Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore Eye Research Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe side effects of dry eye medications can lead to medication non-adherence and, eventually, to poor outcomes. This study aimed to quantify to what extent the side effects of dry eye disease (DED) medications (burning/stinging sensation and blurring) are important to patients compared to medication benefits or costs.

methodsPatients diagnosed with DED were recruited at a referral eye center in Singapore (n = 139). This study utilized a Discrete Choice Experiment where patients were presented with 10 choice tasks where they were asked to choose between their current medication (or no medication), and two hypothetical medications that varied based on five attributes: duration of burning/stinging, duration of blurring, time to medication effectiveness, medication frequency, and out-of-pocket cost. The main outcomes were relative attribute importance and predicted uptake.

resultsLatent class logistic regressions found two groups with distinct preferences. For both classes, duration of burning/stinging (Class 1 = 23%, Class 2 = 29%) and cost (Class 1 = 24%, Class 2 = 27%) were the most important attributes while duration of blurring (Class 1 = 15%, Class 2 = 9%) was the least important. The predicted uptake of a medication increased 18 percentage-points when burning/stinging duration decreased from 2 h to a few minutes. The predicted uptake for new medications was lowest for those on medication with well-controlled symptoms and highest for those who were not on medication and could not control their symptoms effectively.

conclusionThis study showed that duration of burning/stinging was an important factor when choosing medications. Incorporating patient preferences in medication decisions can potentially improve patient acceptance of a treatment regimen.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesPatient PreferenceHealth ExpendituresHumansLogistic ModelsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35697974
PMCPMC9192251
OpenAlexW4282821813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.