Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697952›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2022

Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.

Francois Guérit, John C Middlebrooks, Matthew L Richardson, Akshat Arneja, Andrew J Harland, Robin Gransier, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  2. High Spectral and Temporal Acuity in Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Cats.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francois GuéritCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
John C MiddlebrooksDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Matthew L RichardsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Akshat ArnejaDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Andrew J HarlandCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Robin GransierDept. of Neurosciences, ExpORL, Leuven, Louvain, KU, Belgium.
Jan WoutersDept. of Neurosciences, ExpORL, Leuven, Louvain, KU, Belgium.
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England. bob.carlyon@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-501X
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of California, Irvine · USKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/4Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust RG91976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a scalp-recorded measure of tonotopic selectivity, the "cortical onset response" (COR) and compare the results between humans and cats. The COR results, in turn, were compared with psychophysical masked-detection thresholds obtained using similar stimuli and obtained from both species. The COR consisted of averaged responses elicited by 50-ms tone-burst probes presented at 1-s intervals against a continuous noise masker. The noise masker had a bandwidth of 1 or 1/8th octave, geometrically centred on 4000 Hz for humans and on 8000 Hz for cats. The probe frequency was either - 0.5, - 0.25, 0, 0.25 or 0.5 octaves re the masker centre frequency. The COR was larger for probe frequencies more distant from the centre frequency of the masker, and this effect was greater for the 1/8th-octave than for the 1-octave masker. This pattern broadly reflected the masked excitation patterns obtained psychophysically with similar stimuli in both species. However, the positive signal-to-noise ratio used to obtain reliable COR measures meant that some aspects of the data differed from those obtained psychophysically, in a way that could be partly explained by the upward spread of the probe's excitation pattern. Our psychophysical measurements also showed that the auditory filter width obtained at 8000 Hz using notched-noise maskers was slightly wider in cat than previous measures from humans. We argue that although conclusions from COR measures differ in some ways from conclusions based on psychophysics, the COR measures provide an objective, noninvasive, valid measure of tonotopic selectivity that does not require training and that may be applied to acoustic and cochlear-implant experiments in humans and laboratory animals.

Indexed as

NoisePerceptual MaskingAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCatsElectrophysiologyHumansPsychophysicscatcortical onset responseelectrophysiologyhumanpsychophysicstonotopic selectivity

Identifiers

PMID35697952
PMCPMC9437197
OpenAlexW4282830924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.