Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697945›Full record

ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2022

Blood and saliva SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in self-collected dried spot samples.

Laura Lahdentausta, Anne Kivimäki, Lotta Oksanen, Marika Tallgren, Sampo Oksanen, Enni Sanmark, Aino Salminen, Ahmed Geneid, Mikko Sairanen, Susanna Paju and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Profiling of Anti-glycan IgA and IgG in Oral Fluid Using a Glycan Microarray.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura LahdentaustaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. laura.lahdentausta@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-660X
Anne KivimäkiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Lotta OksanenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Marika TallgrenPerkinElmer Finland Oy, 20101, Turku, Finland.
Sampo OksanenAalto University School of Business, Espoo, Finland.
Enni SanmarkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Aino SalminenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Ahmed GeneidDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko SairanenPerkinElmer Finland Oy, 20101, Turku, Finland.
Susanna PajuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Kalle SakselaDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirkko PussinenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Milla PietiäinenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIPerkinElmer (Finland) · FIAalto University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the usefulness of dried spot blood and saliva samples in SARS-CoV-2 antibody analyses. We analyzed 1231 self-collected dried spot blood and saliva samples from healthcare workers. Participants filled in a questionnaire on their COVID-19 exposures, infections, and vaccinations. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were determined from both samples using the GSP/DELFIA method. The level of exposure was the strongest determinant of all blood antibody classes and saliva IgG, increasing as follows: (1) no exposure (healthy, non-vaccinated), (2) exposed, (3) former COVID-19 infection, (4) one vaccination, (5) two vaccinations, and (6) vaccination and former infection. While the blood IgG assay had a 99.5% sensitivity and 75.3% specificity to distinguish participants with two vaccinations from all other types of exposure, the corresponding percentages for saliva IgG were 85.3% and 65.7%. Both blood and saliva IgG-seropositivity proportions followed similar trends to the exposures reported in the questionnaires. Self-collected dry blood and saliva spot samples combined with the GSP/DELFIA technique comprise a valuable tool to investigate an individual's immune response to SARS-CoV-2 exposure or vaccination. Saliva IgG has high potential to monitor vaccination response wane, since the sample is non-invasive and easy to collect.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin GSalivaAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GAntibodyBloodCOVID-19Dried spot sampleExposureSalivaSARS-CoV-2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35697945
PMCPMC9191541
OpenAlexW4282557840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.