Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A proof-of-concept study to construct Bayesian network decision models for supporting the categorization of sudden unexpected infant death.

Hideki Hamayasu, Masashi Miyao, Chihiro Kawai, Toshio Osamura, Akira Yamamoto, Hirozo Minami, Hitoshi Abiru, Keiji Tamaki, Hirokazu Kotani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of a Risk Score to Predict Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki Hamayasu *Department of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masashi Miyao *Department of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Chihiro KawaiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshio OsamuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Akira YamamotoCenter for Medical Education, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirozo MinamiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoshi AbiruDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Keiji TamakiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirokazu KotaniDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Sciences, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 5148507, Japan. hirokazu-kotani@med.mie-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) remains a leading cause of infant death in high-income countries. Supporting models for categorization of sudden unexpected infant death into SIDS/non-SIDS could reduce mortality. Therefore, we aimed to develop such a tool utilizing forensic data, but the reduced number of SIDS cases renders this task inherently difficult. To overcome this, we constructed Bayesian network models according to diagnoses performed by expert pathologists and created conditional probability tables in a proof-of-concept study. In the diagnostic support model, the data of 64 sudden unexpected infant death cases was employed as the training dataset, and 16 known-risk factors, including age at death and co-sleeping, were added. In the validation study, which included 8 new cases, the models reproduced experts' diagnoses in 4 or 5 of the 6 SIDS cases. Next, to confirm the effectiveness of this approach for onset prediction, the data from 41 SIDS cases was employed. The model predicted that the risk of SIDS in 0- to 2-month-old infants exposed to passive smoking and co-sleeping is eightfold higher than that in the general infant population, which is comparable with previously published findings. The Bayesian approach could be a promising tool for constructing SIDS prevention models.

Indexed as

Sudden Infant DeathTobacco Smoke PollutionBayes TheoremHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsSleepTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID35697924
PMCPMC9192651
OpenAlexW4282590974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.