Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697913›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Audience effect on domestic dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions.

Giulia Pedretti, Chiara Canori, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Rupert Palme, Annalisa Pelosi, Paola Valsecchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What if the reward is not as yummy? Study of the effects of Successive Negative Contrast in domestic dogs in two different tasks.Journal of veterinary behavior : clinical applications and research : official journal of : Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, International Working Dog Breeding Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Why do dogs wag their tails?Biology letters · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia PedrettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. giulia.pedretti@unipr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-351X
Chiara CanoriDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Sarah Marshall-PesciniDomestication Lab, Wolf Science Center, Konrad-Lorenz-Institute for Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert PalmeUnit of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9466-3662
Annalisa PelosiDepartment of Chemistry, Life Science and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 17/A, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Paola ValsecchiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study we investigated the influence of positive and negative arousal situations and the presence of an audience on dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions. We exposed dogs to positive anticipation, non-social frustration and social frustration evoking test sessions and measured pre and post-test salivary cortisol concentrations. Cortisol concentration did not increase during the tests and there was no difference in pre or post-test concentrations in the different test conditions, excluding a different level of arousal. Displacement behaviours of "looking away" and "sniffing the environment" occurred more in the frustration-evoking situations compared to the positive anticipation and were correlated with cortisol concentrations. "Ears forward" occurred more in the positive anticipation condition compared to the frustration-evoking conditions, was positively influenced by the presence of an audience, and negatively correlated to the pre-test cortisol concentrations, suggesting it may be a good indicator of dogs' level of attention. "Ears flattener", "blink", "nose lick", "tail wagging" and "whining" were associated with the presence of an audience but were not correlated to cortisol concentrations, suggesting a communicative component of these visual displays. These findings are a first step to systematically test which subtle cues could be considered communicative signals in domestic dogs.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionHydrocortisoneAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsFrustrationVocalization, AnimalHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID35697913
PMCPMC9192729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.