Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697909›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2022

In Vivo Modeling of Human Breast Cancer Using Cell Line and Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Eric P Souto, Lacey E Dobrolecki, Hugo Villanueva, Andrew G Sikora, Michael T Lewis

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advancements in Zebrafish Models for Breast Cancer Research: Unveiling Biomarkers, Targeted Therapies, and Personalized Medicine.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Contrast-enhanced photon-counting micro-CT of tumor xenograft models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric P SoutoLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Lacey E DobroleckiLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Hugo VillanuevaOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Andrew G SikoraDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Michael T LewisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. mtlewis@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6330-4007

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Suzanne AW Fuqua · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
Tolinapant efficacy in a subset of triple negative breast cancersU54CA224076 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Alana L. Welm · 2017 to 2026
$13.5M
Deciphering Mechanisms by which Tumor Cells Collaborate to Mediate MetastasisR01CA224867 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FORD, HEIDE L., LEWIS, MICHAEL T. · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS R01 CA224867NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, human breast cancer has been modeled largely in vitro using long-established cell lines primarily in two-dimensional culture, but also in three-dimensional cultures of varying cellular and molecular complexities. A subset of cell line models has also been used in vivo as cell line-derived xenografts (CDX). While outstanding for conducting detailed molecular analysis of regulatory mechanisms that may function in vivo, results of drug response studies using long-established cell lines have largely failed to translate clinically. In an attempt to address this shortcoming, many laboratories have succeeded in developing clinically annotated patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of human cancers, including breast, in a variety of host systems. While immunocompromised mice are the predominant host, the immunocompromised rat and pig, zebrafish, as well as the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) have also emerged as potential host platforms to help address perceived shortcomings of immunocompromised mice. With any modeling platform, the two main issues to be resolved are criteria for "credentialing" the models as valid models to represent human cancer, and utility with respect to the ability to generate clinically relevant translational research data. Such data are beginning to emerge, particularly with the activities of PDX consortia such as the NCI PDXNet Program, EuroPDX, and the International Breast Cancer Consortium, as well as a host of pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations (CRO). This review focuses primarily on these important aspects of PDX-related research, with a focus on breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsCell LineDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceRatsSwineXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysZebrafishImmunodeficient mouse and rat modelsIn vivo modelsPatient-derived xenograftPreclinical drug screeningPreclinical trials

Identifiers

PMID35697909
PMCPMC9433358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.