Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697811›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

What if using certified reference materials (CRMs) was a requirement to publish in analytical/bioanalytical chemistry journals?

Stephen A Wise

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Reference materials in analytical chemistry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen A WiseOffice of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA. stephen.wise@nih.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certified reference materials (CRMs) are routinely used by analytical chemists to validate new analytical methods and to demonstrate the quality of their quantitative measurements. Even though CRMs for trace element and trace organic analysis have been available and widely used for over 50 years, the majority of papers published in analytical chemistry journals do not mention the use of CRMs. What if analytical/bioanalytical chemistry journals required the use of CRMs to publish a paper? This feature article attempts to address this question by providing examples of recent papers that have made exceptional use of CRMs to validate new analytical methods and to describe novel, alternative uses of CRMs that provide new characterization of the CRM. The potential benefits of using a CRM even when it does not have certified values for the analytes of interest are presented.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicTrace ElementsChemistry, AnalyticReference StandardsTrace ElementsCertified reference material (CRM)Environmental contaminantsLipidomicsMetabolomicsMethod validationStandard reference material (SRM)

Identifiers

PMID35697811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.