Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697787›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Dietary supplements do not improve bone morphology or mechanical properties in young female C57BL/6 mice.

Amy Creecy, Collier Smith, Joseph M Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy CreecyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, SL 220B, 723 W. Michigan St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Collier SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, SL 220B, 723 W. Michigan St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Joseph M WallaceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, SL 220B, 723 W. Michigan St., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. jmwalla@iupui.edu.

Funding

Comprehensive Training Program in Musculoskeletal ResearchT32AR065971 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ALEXANDER G ROBLING · 2015 to 2026
$4.4M
Targeting collagen as an interventional approach to improve bone material propertiesR01AR072609 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WALLACE, JOSEPH MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR072609NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR065971NIH HHS AR065971NIH HHS AR072609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a hierarchical material formed by an organic extracellular matrix and mineral where each component and their physical relationship with each other contribute to fracture resistance. Bone quality can be affected by nutrition, and dietary supplements that are marketed to improve overall health may improve the fracture resistance of bone. To test this, 11 week old female C57BL/6 mice were fed either collagen, chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine sulfate, or fish oil 5 times a week for 8 weeks. Femurs, tibiae, and vertebrae were scanned with micro-computed tomography and then mechanically tested. Glucosamine and fish oil lowered elastic modulus, but did not alter the overall strength of the femur. There were no differences in bone mechanics of the tibiae or vertebrae. Overall, the data suggest that dietary supplements did little to improve bone quality in young, healthy mice. These supplements may be more effective in diseased or aged mice.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesFemurAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DensityDietary SupplementsFemaleFish OilsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLX-Ray MicrotomographyFish Oils

Identifiers

PMID35697787
PMCPMC9192719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.