Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697775›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2022

Evaluation of novel 3D-printed and conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision patient fixation masks for radiotherapy.

Veronika M Miron, Tanja Etzelstorfer, Raimund Kleiser, Tobias Raffelsberger, Zoltan Major, Hans Geinitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic CTs for MRI-only brain RT treatment: integration of immobilization systems.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika M MironInstitute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria. veronika.maria.miron@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2316-5177
Tanja EtzelstorferAbteilung für Radioonkologie, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010, Linz, Austria.
Raimund KleiserDepartment of Neuroradiology, Johannes Kepler University Clinic, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Tobias RaffelsbergerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Johannes Kepler University Clinic, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15, 4020, Linz, Austria.
Zoltan MajorInstitute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Hans GeinitzAbteilung für Radioonkologie, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010, Linz, Austria.
Johannes Kepler University of Linz · ATOrdensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor stereotactic radiation therapy of intracranial malignancies, a patient's head needs to be immobilized with high accuracy. Fixation devices such as invasive stereotactic head frames or non-invasive thermoplastic mask systems are often used. However, especially stereotactic high-precision masks often cause discomfort for patients due to a long manufacturing time during which the patient is required to lie still and because the face is covered, including the mouth, nose, eyes, and ears. To avoid these issues, the target was to develop a non-invasive 3D-printable mask system with at least the accuracy of the high-precision masks, for producing masks which can be manufactured in the absence of patients and which allow the eyes, mouth, and nose to be uncovered during therapy.

methodsFor four volunteers, a personalized 3D-printed mask based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was designed and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Additionally, for each of the volunteers, a conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision mask from Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) was fabricated. The intra-fractional fixation accuracy for each mask and volunteer was evaluated using the motion-correction algorithm of functional MRI measurements with and without guided motion.

resultsThe average values for the translations and rotations of the volunteers' heads lie in the range between ±1 mm and ±1° for both masks. Interestingly, the standard deviations and the relative and absolute 3D displacements are lower for the 3D-printed masks compared to the Brainlab masks.

conclusionIt could be shown that the intra-fractional fixation accuracy of the 3D-printed masks was higher than for the conventional stereotactic high-precision masks.

Indexed as

MasksRadiosurgeryHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalImmobilizationPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D printingAdditive manufacturingPatient fixation masksRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35697775
PMCPMC9581856
OpenAlexW4282586351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.