Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697741›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Optimising the classification of feature-based attention in frequency-tagged electroencephalography data.

Angela I Renton, David R Painter, Jason B Mattingley

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela I RentonThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, 4072, Australia. angie.renton23@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4815-9056
David R PainterThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3328-6386
Jason B MattingleyThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-9216

Funding

Department of Education and Training | ARC | Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Australian Research Council (ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function) CE140100007Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT2010141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly expanding field of study and require accurate and reliable real-time decoding of patterns of neural activity. These protocols often exploit selective attention, a neural mechanism that prioritises the sensory processing of task-relevant stimulus features (feature-based attention) or task-relevant spatial locations (spatial attention). Within the visual modality, attentional modulation of neural responses to different inputs is well indexed by steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). These signals are reliably present in single-trial electroencephalography (EEG) data, are largely resilient to common EEG artifacts, and allow separation of neural responses to numerous concurrently presented visual stimuli. To date, efforts to use single-trial SSVEPs to classify visual attention for BCI control have largely focused on spatial attention rather than feature-based attention. Here, we present a dataset that allows for the development and benchmarking of algorithms to classify feature-based attention using single-trial EEG data. The dataset includes EEG and behavioural responses from 30 healthy human participants who performed a feature-based motion discrimination task on frequency tagged visual stimuli.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualAlgorithmsHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35697741
PMCPMC9192640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.