ArticleVaccine2022
A socio-ecological perspective on parents' intentions to vaccinate their children against COVID-19.
Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing COVID-19 Prevention Strategies in K-12 Public Schools.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2025Article
- Parental and adolescent opinion on COVID-19 vaccination among 12-17-year-olds: A hospital-based study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Article
- Vaccination experiences and decision-making in older adult Korean immigrants living in Canada: A qualitative descriptive study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Parents' and Caregivers' Support for in-School COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies: A Socioecological Perspective.Health promotion practice · 2024Article
- Physicians' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations for children: a qualitative exploration in Ontario, Canada.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Immigrant, Refugee, and Nonimmigrant Children and Adolescents in Ontario, Canada.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Factors impacting parental uptake of COVID-19 vaccination for U.S. Children ages 5-17.Vaccine · 2023Article
- Parents' perspectives on SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations for children: a qualitative analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Application of behavioral change theory and models on COVID-19 preventive behaviors, worldwide: A systematic review.SAGE open medicine · 2023Review
- Associations Between Social Networks and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in 4 Rural Alabama Counties: Survey Findings.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVaccinating children against COVID-19 protects children's health and can mitigate the spread of the virus to other community members.
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to use a socio-ecological perspective to identify multi-level factors associated with US parents' intention to vaccinate their children.
methodsThis study used a longitudinal online cohort. Multinomial logistic regression models assessed socio-ecological predictors of negative and uncertain child COVID-19 vaccination intentions compared to positive intentions.
resultsIn June 2021, 297 parents were surveyed and 44% reported that they intended to vaccinate their children while 25% expressed uncertainty and 31% did not intend to vaccinate their children. The likelihood of reporting uncertain or negative intention, compared to positive intention to vaccinate their children was higher among parents who had not received a COVID-19 vaccination and those who did not have trusted information sources. Parents who talked to others at least weekly about the COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to endorse uncertain compared to positive vaccine intentions (aRRR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20-0.93). A sub-analysis identified that parents had significantly higher odds of intending to vaccinate older children compared to younger children (children ages 16-17 years v. 0-4 years OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.05-3.84). An additional sub-analysis assessed the stability of parents' intention to vaccinate their children between March 2021 and June 2021 (N=166). There was transition within each intention group between the study periods; however, symmetry and marginal homogeneity test results indicated that the shift was not statistically significant. Parents expressing uncertainty in March 2021 were the most likely to change their intention, with 24% transitioning to positive intention and 23% to negative intention in June 2021.
conclusionStudy findings suggest that programs to promote vaccination uptake should be dyadic and work to promote child and parent vaccination. Peer diffusion strategies may be particularly effective at promoting child vaccination uptake among parents expressing uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.