Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697573›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Preclinical evaluation of a plant-derived SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine: Protective efficacy, immunogenicity, safety, and toxicity.

Balamurugan Shanmugaraj, Narach Khorattanakulchai, Chalisa Panapitakkul, Ashwini Malla, Rawiwan Im-Erbsin, Manutsanun Inthawong, Piyanate Sunyakumthorn, Taweewun Hunsawong, Chonticha Klungthong, Matthew C Reed and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Balamurugan ShanmugarajBaiya Phytopharm Co., Ltd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Narach KhorattanakulchaiCenter of Excellence in Plant-produced Pharmaceuticals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chalisa PanapitakkulCenter of Excellence in Plant-produced Pharmaceuticals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Ashwini MallaBaiya Phytopharm Co., Ltd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Rawiwan Im-ErbsinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Manutsanun InthawongDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Piyanate SunyakumthornDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Taweewun HunsawongDepartment of Virology, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Chonticha KlungthongDepartment of Virology, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Matthew C ReedDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Army Medical Directorate-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Taratorn KemthongNational Primate Research Center of Thailand-Chulalongkorn University, Saraburi 18110, Thailand.
Nutchanat SuttisanNational Primate Research Center of Thailand-Chulalongkorn University, Saraburi 18110, Thailand.
Suchinda MalaivijitnondNational Primate Research Center of Thailand-Chulalongkorn University, Saraburi 18110, Thailand.
Passaraporn SrimangkornkaewNational Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Aekkarin KlinkhamhomNational Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Suwimon ManopwisedjaroenDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Arunee ThitithanyanontDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Suthira TaychakhoonavudhDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Waranyoo PhoolcharoenCenter of Excellence in Plant-produced Pharmaceuticals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. Electronic address: Waranyoo.P@chula.ac.th.
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THChulalongkorn University · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission has become a global priority. Previously, we showed that a protein subunit vaccine that was developed based on the fusion of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) to the Fc portion of human IgG1 (RBD-Fc), produced in Nicotiana benthamiana, and adjuvanted with alum, namely, Baiya SARS-CoV-2 Vax 1, induced potent immunological responses in both mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Hence, this study evaluated the protective efficacy, safety, and toxicity of Baiya SARS-CoV-2 Vax 1 in K18-hACE2 mice, monkeys and Wistar rats. Two doses of vaccine were administered three weeks apart on Days 0 and 21. The administration of the vaccine to K18-hACE2 mice reduced viral loads in the lungs and brains of the vaccinated animals and protected the mice against challenge with SARS-CoV-2. In monkeys, the results of safety pharmacology tests, general clinical observations, and a core battery of studies of three vital systems, namely, the central nervous, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, did not reveal any safety concerns. The toxicology study of the vaccine in rats showed no vaccine-related pathological changes, and all the animals remained healthy under the conditions of this study. Furthermore, the vaccine did not cause any abnormal toxicity in rats and was clinically tolerated even at the highest tested concentration. In addition, general health status, body temperature, local toxicity at the administration site, hematology, and blood chemistry parameters were also monitored. Overall, this work presents the results of the first systematic study of the safety profile of a plant-derived vaccine, Baiya SARS-CoV-2 Vax 1; this approach can be considered a viable strategy for the development of vaccines against COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunogenicity, VaccineAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRatsRats, WistarSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SubunitAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SubunitCOVID-19Plant-produced subunit vaccineProtective immunityReceptor binding domainSARS-CoV-2Toxicology

Identifiers

PMID35697573
PMCPMC9167921
OpenAlexW4282031643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.