Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697386›Full record

ArticleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2022

Patient risk screening to improve transitions of care in surgical opioid prescribing: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.

Shelby Hinds, Jacquelyn Miller, Merissa Maccani, Sarah Patino, Shivani Kaushal, Heidi Rieck, Monica Walker, Chad M Brummett, Mark C Bicket, Jennifer F Waljee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shelby HindsDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jacquelyn MillerCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Merissa MaccaniMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sarah PatinoUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shivani KaushalMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Heidi RieckMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2698-0081
Monica WalkerMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Chad M BrummettDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mark C BicketDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-5953
Jennifer F WaljeeCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA filip@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

University of Michigan Fibromyalgia CORTP50AR070600 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HARRIS, RICHARD E · 2016 to 2021
$7.4M
oPIOIDS: Prevention of Iatrogenic Opioid Dependence after SurgeryR01DA042859 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, WALJEE, JENNIFER FILIP · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR070600NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn patients undergoing surgical procedures, transitions in opioid prescribing occur across multiple providers during the months before and after surgery. These transitions often result in high-risk and uncoordinated prescribing practices, especially for surgical patients with prior opioid exposure. However, perspectives of relevant providers about screening and care coordination to address these risks are unknown.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 24 surgery, primary care, and anesthesia providers in Michigan regarding behaviors and attitudes about screening surgical patients to inform perioperative opioid prescribing in relation to transitions of care. We used an interpretive description framework to topically code interview transcripts and synthesize underlying themes in analytical memos.

resultsProviders believed that coordinated, multidisciplinary approaches to identify patients at risk of poor pain and opioid-related outcomes could improve transitions of care for surgical opioid prescribing. Anesthesia and primary care providers saw value in knowing patients' preoperative risk related to opioid use, while surgeons' perceptions varied widely. Across specialties, most providers favored a screening tool if coupled with actionable recommendations, sufficient resources, and facilitated coordination between specialties. Providers identified a lack of pain specialists and a dearth of actionable guidelines to direct interventions for patients at high opioid-related risk as major limitations to the value of patient screening. DISCUSSION: These findings provide context to address risk from prescription opioids in surgical transitions of care, which should include identifying high-risk patients, implementing a coordinated plan, and emphasizing actionable recommendations.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersDrug PrescriptionsHumansPostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersPain, PostoperativePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35697386
PMCPMC9240329
OpenAlexW4282842075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.