Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35697080›Full record

ArticleNursing for women's health2022

Women's and Nurses' Perceptions of Visitor Restrictions After Childbirth During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Christine Elling, Martha Rider Sleutel, JoNell Wells, Patricia Newcomb, Ericka Valdez, Krystal Walker, Tina Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing for women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine Elling
Martha Rider Sleutel
JoNell Wells
Patricia Newcomb
Ericka Valdez
Krystal Walker
Tina Nguyen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the perceptions of labor and delivery (L&D) nurses and childbearing women in the postpartum period regarding a restricted visitor policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designDescriptive mixed-methods survey and open-ended questions. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: One hospital in the southwestern United States. There is limited evidence regarding recently imposed visitor restrictions related to COVID-19.

participantsIndividuals who were pregnant and self-identified as women who gave birth during October 2020 through March 2021 (n = 674) and L&D nurses (n = 47). INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: Participants who had given birth with visitor restrictions completed an online survey, and L&D nurses completed a paper survey.

resultsChildbearing women had positive and negative views; they valued a more intimate familial bonding and recovery without visitors and appreciated decreased pressure to accommodate family/friends. They were also disappointed with sibling restrictions and were sad and frustrated with visitor limitations, especially in special circumstances (e.g., NICU admission or extended stays). Nurses expressed that visitor restrictions allowed more time for higher-quality nursing care/patient teaching and decreased distractions in emergencies, leading to safer care. Women and nurses reported that visitor restrictions allowed women more rest and relaxation as well as less worry and strain from juggling family and friends who wanted to visit, but they also identified that there was decreased family support when it was needed.

conclusionWomen's responses were mixed, with some preferring support from many visitors, while others appreciated the intimate focus of just their partner. Most nurses preferred fewer visitors but could empathize with women.

Indexed as

COVID-19Labor, ObstetricNursesFemaleHumansPandemicsParturitionPregnancychildbirthCOVID-19hospitallabor and deliverynewbornpandemicperceptionpostpartumpregnancyvisitationvisitor restriction

Identifiers

PMID35697080
PMCPMC9187511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.