Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696744›Full record

ReviewESMO open2022

Role of molecular genetics in the clinical management of cholangiocarcinoma.

N Normanno, E Martinelli, D Melisi, C Pinto, L Rimassa, D Santini, A Scarpa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic Impact of Concomitant Genomic Alterations in FGFR2-Positive Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Pemigatinib.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pathologica · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

N NormannoCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: n.normanno@istitutotumori.na.it.
E MartinelliMedical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania 'L. Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
D MelisiInvestigational Cancer Therapeutics Clinical Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Digestive Molecular Clinical Oncology Research Unit, University of Verona, Policlinico B.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy.
C PintoMedical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
L RimassaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
D SantiniMedical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
A ScarpaARC-Net Research Centre and Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has steadily increased during the past 20 years, and mortality is increasing. The majority of patients with CCA have advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis, and treatment options for unresectable disease are limited, resulting in poor prognosis. However, recent identification of targetable genomic alterations has expanded treatment options for eligible patients. Given the importance of early and accurate diagnosis in optimizing patient outcomes, this review discusses best practices in CCA diagnosis, with a focus on categorizing molecular genetics and available targeted therapies. Imaging and staging of CCAs are discussed, as well as recommended biopsy collection techniques, and molecular and genomic profiling methodologies, which have become increasingly important as molecular biomarker data accumulate. Approved agents targeting actionable genomic alterations specifically in patients with CCA include ivosidenib for tumors harboring IDH1 mutations, and infigratinib and pemigatinib for those with FGFR2 fusions. Other agents currently under development in this indication have shown promising results, which are presented here.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansMolecular Biologyextrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaFGFR2genomic profileIDH1intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35696744
PMCPMC9198375
OpenAlexW4281723364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.