Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696691›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2022

U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.

Kevin F Boehnke, Owen Dean, Rebecca L Haffajee, Avinash Hosanagar

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cannabis Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin F BoehnkeAnesthesiology Department, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (K.F.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-3696-3979
Owen DeanCollege of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (O.D.).
Rebecca L HaffajeeOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, DC (R.L.H.).
Avinash HosanagarVeterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-2056-1097
University of Michigan · USOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation · US

Funding

Cannabinoid Effects on Sleep and Pain Mechanisms in Osteoarthritis of the KneeK01DA049219 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOEHNKE, KEVIN FOXMAN · 2020 to 2023
$569k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA049219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis policy liberalization has increased cannabis availability for medical or recreational purposes. Up-to-date trends in medical cannabis licensure can inform clinical policy and care.

objectiveTo describe recent trends in medical cannabis licensure in the United States.

designEcological study with repeated measures.

settingState registry data via state reports and data requests on medical cannabis licensure from 2016 to 2020.

participantsMedical cannabis patients (persons with medical cannabis licenses) in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Total patient volume, patients per 10 000 of total population, and patient-reported qualifying conditions (that is, symptoms or conditions qualifying patients for licensure)-including whether these symptoms align with current therapeutic evidence of cannabis-cannabinoid efficacy.

resultsIn 2020, 26 states and Washington, DC reported patient numbers, and 19 states reported patient-reported qualifying conditions. Total enrolled patients increased approximately 4.5-fold from 678 408 in 2016 to 2 974 433 in 2020. Patients per 10 000 total population generally increased from 2016 to 2020, most dramatically in Oklahoma (927.1 patients per 10 000 population). However, enrollment increased in states without recreational legalization (that is, medical-only states), whereas enrollment decreased in 5 of 7 with recreational legalization (that is, recreational states). In 2020, 68.2% of patient-reported qualifying conditions had substantial or conclusive evidence of therapeutic value versus 84.6% in 2016. Chronic pain was the most common patient-reported qualifying condition in 2020 (60.6%), followed by posttraumatic stress disorder (10.6%). LIMITATION: Missing state data; lack of rationale for discontinuing medical cannabis licensure.

conclusionEnrollment in medical cannabis programs approximately increased 4.5-fold from 2016 to 2020, although enrollment decreased in recreational states. Use for conditions or symptoms without a strong evidence basis increased from 15.4% (2016) to 31.8% (2020). Thoughtful regulatory and clinical strategies are needed to effectively manage this rapidly changing landscape. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

CannabisChronic PainMedical MarijuanaAnalgesicsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAnalgesicsMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID35696691
PMCPMC10233658
OpenAlexW4282829968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.