Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696676›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2022

Multiparametric High-Content Cell Painting Identifies Copper Ionophores as Selective Modulators of Esophageal Cancer Phenotypes.

Rebecca E Hughes, Richard J R Elliott, Xiaodun Li, Alison F Munro, Ashraff Makda, Roderick N Carter, Nicholas M Morton, Kenji Fujihara, Nicholas J Clemons, Rebecca Fitzgerald and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca E HughesCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0590-4135
Richard J R ElliottCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.
Xiaodun LiMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, U.K.
Alison F MunroCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.
Ashraff MakdaCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.
Roderick N CarterCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Chancellors Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, U.K.
Nicholas M MortonCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, U.K.
Kenji FujiharaGastrointestinal Cancer Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas J ClemonsGastrointestinal Cancer Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca FitzgeraldEarly Cancer Institute, Hutchison Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, U.K.
J Robert O'NeillCambridge Oesophagogastric Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-7137
Ted HuppCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.
Neil O CarragherCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-9747
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBHutchison/MRC Research Centre · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24892Medical Research Council MR/R015635/1Medical Research Council MR/W014122/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is of increasing global concern due to increasing incidence, a lack of effective treatments, and poor prognosis. Therapeutic target discovery and clinical trials have been hindered by the heterogeneity of the disease, the lack of "druggable" driver mutations, and the dominance of large-scale genomic rearrangements. We have previously undertaken a comprehensive small-molecule phenotypic screen using the high-content Cell Painting assay to quantify the morphological response to a total of 19,555 small molecules across a panel of genetically distinct human esophageal cell lines to identify new therapeutic targets and small molecules for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In this current study, we report for the first time the dose-response validation studies for the 72 screening hits from the target-annotated LOPAC and Prestwick FDA-approved compound libraries and the full list of 51 validated esophageal adenocarcinoma-selective small molecules (71% validation rate). We then focus on the most potent and selective hit molecules, elesclomol, disulfiram, and ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate. Using a multipronged, multitechnology approach, we uncover a unified mechanism of action and a vulnerability in esophageal adenocarcinoma toward copper-dependent cell death that could be targeted in the future.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsCopperHumansIonophoresPhenotypeCopperIonophores

Identifiers

PMID35696676
PMCPMC9295120
OpenAlexW4282838143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.