Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696561›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Whiskers as hydrodynamic prey sensors in foraging seals.

Taiki Adachi, Yasuhiko Naito, Patrick W Robinson, Daniel P Costa, Luis A Hückstädt, Rachel R Holser, Wataru Iwasaki, Akinori Takahashi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vibrissal sensing in mammals in a changing world.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Wonders of Harbor and Grey Seal Whiskers: Morphology, Natural Frequencies, and 3D Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Large sensory volumes enable Southern elephant seals to exploit sparse deep-sea prey.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Taiki AdachiNational Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan.
Yasuhiko NaitoNational Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan.
Patrick W RobinsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
Daniel P CostaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-5782
Luis A HückstädtInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
Rachel R HolserInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-3839
Wataru IwasakiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan.
Akinori TakahashiNational Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-0408
University of California, Santa Cruz · USNational Institute of Polar Research · JPThe Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The darkness of the deep ocean limits the vision of diving predators, except when prey emit bioluminescence. It is hypothesized that deep-diving seals rely on highly developed whiskers to locate their prey. However, if and how seals use their whiskers while foraging in natural conditions remains unknown. We used animal-borne tags to show that free-ranging elephant seals use their whiskers for hydrodynamic prey sensing. Small, cheek-mounted video loggers documented seals actively protracting their whiskers in front of their mouths with rhythmic whisker movement, like terrestrial mammals exploring their environment. Seals focused their sensing effort at deep foraging depths, performing prolonged whisker protraction to detect, pursue, and capture prey. Feeding-event recorders with light sensors demonstrated that bioluminescence contributed to only about 20% of overall foraging success, confirming that whiskers play the primary role in sensing prey. Accordingly, visual prey detection complemented and enhanced prey capture. The whiskers' role highlights an evolutionary alternative to echolocation for adapting to the extreme dark of the deep ocean environment, revealing how sensory abilities shape foraging niche segregation in deep-diving mammals. Mammals typically have mobile facial whiskers, and our study reveals the significant function of whiskers in the natural foraging behavior of a marine predator. We demonstrate the importance of field-based sensory studies incorporating multimodality to better understand how multiple sensory systems are complementary in shaping the foraging success of predators.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPredatory BehaviorSeals, EarlessVibrissaeAnimalsHydrodynamicsbio-loggingdeep oceanmammalsensory systemwhisker

Identifiers

PMID35696561
PMCPMC9231483
OpenAlexW4282585498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.