ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
HiCImpute: A Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying structural zeros and enhancing single cell Hi-C data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- ssJSD: A Fusion of Sparsity and Spatial Information for HiC Single-Cell Clustering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- szKendall: spatial-structural-zero-aware dissimilarity measures for subtype discovery using single cell Hi-C data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Harmonizing single-cell 3D genome data with STARK and scNucleome.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Navigating the 3D genome at single-cell resolution: techniques, computation, and mechanistic landscapes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Article
- Single-Cell Hi-C Technologies and Computational Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Topologically associating domains of chromatin on single-cell Hi-C data: a survey of bioinformatic tools and applications in the light of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Can random walking on a Hi-C contact matrix lead to data quality improvement? An assessment.PloS one · 2025Article
- Single-cell omics: experimental workflow, data analyses and applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- [Advances in methods and applications of single-cell Hi-C data analysis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single cell Hi-C techniques enable one to study cell to cell variability in chromatin interactions. However, single cell Hi-C (scHi-C) data suffer severely from sparsity, that is, the existence of excess zeros due to insufficient sequencing depth. Complicating the matter further is the fact that not all zeros are created equal: some are due to loci truly not interacting because of the underlying biological mechanism (structural zeros); others are indeed due to insufficient sequencing depth (sampling zeros or dropouts), especially for loci that interact infrequently. Differentiating between structural zeros and dropouts is important since correct inference would improve downstream analyses such as clustering and discovery of subtypes. Nevertheless, distinguishing between these two types of zeros has received little attention in the single cell Hi-C literature, where the issue of sparsity has been addressed mainly as a data quality improvement problem. To fill this gap, in this paper, we propose HiCImpute, a Bayesian hierarchical model that goes beyond data quality improvement by also identifying observed zeros that are in fact structural zeros. HiCImpute takes spatial dependencies of scHi-C 2D data structure into account while also borrowing information from similar single cells and bulk data, when such are available. Through an extensive set of analyses of synthetic and real data, we demonstrate the ability of HiCImpute for identifying structural zeros with high sensitivity, and for accurate imputation of dropout values. Downstream analyses using data improved from HiCImpute yielded much more accurate clustering of cell types compared to using observed data or data improved by several comparison methods. Most significantly, HiCImpute-improved data have led to the identification of subtypes within each of the excitatory neuronal cells of L4 and L5 in the prefrontal cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.