Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696428›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Modeling cell biological features of meiotic chromosome pairing to study interlock resolution.

Erik J Navarro, Wallace F Marshall, Jennifer C Fung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Kinetic analysis of synaptonemal complex dynamics during meiosis of yeastFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik J NavarroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Center of Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-2331
Wallace F MarshallDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-5763
Jennifer C FungDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Center of Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1750-4673

Funding

UCSF Environmental Research and Translation for Health Center (EaRTH Center)P30ES030284 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Rashmi Joglekar · 2020 to 2026
$11.2M
STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008284 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KORTEMME, TANJA · 1988 to 2022
$10.1M
Origins of Cell GeometryR35GM130327 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Wallace Marshall · 2019 to 2026
$5.3M
Quantitative Analysis of Meiotic Chromosome Motion and PairingR01GM137126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUNG, JENNIFER C · 2020 to 2023
$1.5M
Modeling and Analysis of Meiotic Homolog PairingR01GM116895 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUNG, JENNIFER C · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030284NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116895NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137126NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130327NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes become associated side by side in a process known as homologous chromosome pairing. Pairing requires long range chromosome motion through a nucleus that is full of other chromosomes. It remains unclear how the cell manages to align each pair of chromosomes quickly while mitigating and resolving interlocks. Here, we use a coarse-grained molecular dynamics model to investigate how specific features of meiosis, including motor-driven telomere motion, nuclear envelope interactions, and increased nuclear size, affect the rate of pairing and the mitigation/resolution of interlocks. By creating in silico versions of three yeast strains and comparing the results of our model to experimental data, we find that a more distributed placement of pairing sites along the chromosome is necessary to replicate experimental findings. Active motion of the telomeric ends speeds up pairing only if binding sites are spread along the chromosome length. Adding a meiotic bouquet significantly speeds up pairing but does not significantly change the number of interlocks. An increase in nuclear size slows down pairing while greatly reducing the number of interlocks. Interestingly, active forces increase the number of interlocks, which raises the question: How do these interlocks resolve? Our model gives us detailed movies of interlock resolution events which we then analyze to build a step-by-step recipe for interlock resolution. In our model, interlocks must first translocate to the ends, where they are held in a quasi-stable state by a large number of paired sites on one side. To completely resolve an interlock, the telomeres of the involved chromosomes must come in close proximity so that the cooperativity of pairing coupled with random motion causes the telomeres to unwind. Together our results indicate that computational modeling of homolog pairing provides insight into the specific cell biological changes that occur during meiosis.

Indexed as

Chromosome PairingMeiosisNuclear EnvelopeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTelomere

Identifiers

PMID35696428
PMCPMC9232156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.