ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022
Estimating the duration of antibody positivity and likely time of Leptospira infection using data from a cross-sectional serological study in Fiji.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social marginalisation, environmental degradation and Toxoplasma gondii exposure in urban informal settlements in Brazil.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Historical reconstruction of the earliest enterovirus A71 epidemics in Japan in the 1960s.Epidemiology and infection · 2026Article
- Leptospirosis in the Caribbean Region between 2000 and 2022: A scoping review of morbidity and mortality.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Epidemiological characteristics of leptospirosis and serological surveillance among reservoir animals and healthy populations in Fujian, China, 2004-2024.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Leptospirosis seroprevalence and exposure factors in three informal settlements of French Guiana: An opportunistic survey.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Quantifying Spatial variation in environmental and sociodemographic drivers of leptospirosis in the Dominican Republic using a geographically weighted regression model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantification of tuberculosis exposure in a high-burdened setting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leptospirosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- RSero: A user-friendly R package to reconstruct pathogen circulation history from seroprevalence studies.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Gender differences in Leptospira exposure risk, perceptions of disease severity, and high-risk behaviours in Salvador, Brazil: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Seroepidemiology of human leptospirosis in the Dominican Republic: A multistage cluster survey, 2021.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Serodynamics: A primer and synthetic review of methods for epidemiological inference using serological data.Epidemics · 2024Review
- Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis for Leptospirosis: Previous Shortcomings and Future Needs.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Gender differences in the perception of leptospirosis severity, behaviours, andmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Quantifying the relationship between climatic indicators and leptospirosis incidence in Fiji: A modelling study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Seroprevalence, distribution, and risk factors for human leptospirosis in the United States Virgin Islands.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeptospirosis is a zoonotic disease prevalent throughout the world, but with particularly high burden in Oceania (including the Pacific Island Countries and Territories). Leptospirosis is endemic in Fiji, with outbreaks often occurring following heavy rainfall and flooding. As a result of non-specific clinical manifestation and diagnostic challenges, cases are often misdiagnosed or under-ascertained. Furthermore, little is known about the duration of persistence of antibodies to leptospirosis, which has important clinical and epidemiological implications. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL
findingsUsing the results from a serosurvey conducted in Fiji in 2013, we fitted serocatalytic models to estimate the duration of antibody positivity and the force of infection (FOI, the rate at which susceptible individuals acquire infection or seroconversion), whilst accounting for seroreversion. Additionally, we estimated the most likely timing of infection. Using the reverse catalytic model, we estimated the duration of antibody persistence to be 8.33 years (4.76-12.50; assuming constant FOI) and 7.25 years (3.36-11.36; assuming time-varying FOI), which is longer than previous estimates. Using population age-structured seroprevalence data alone, we were not able to distinguish between these two models. However, by bringing in additional longitudinal data on antibody kinetics we were able to estimate the most likely time of infection, lending support to the time-varying FOI model. We found that most individuals who were antibody-positive in the 2013 serosurvey were likely to have been infected within the previous two years, and this finding is consistent with surveillance data showing high numbers of cases reported in 2012 and 2013.
conclusionsThis is the first study to use serocatalytic models to estimate the FOI and seroreversion rate for Leptospira infection. As well as providing an estimate for the duration of antibody positivity, we also present a novel method to estimate the most likely time of infection from seroprevalence data. These approaches can allow for richer, longitudinal information to be inferred from cross-sectional studies, and could be applied to other endemic diseases where antibody waning occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.