Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696133›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Long-Term Observation of the Electrode-Tissue Interface.

Samuel A Titchener, David A X Nayagam, Jessica Kvansakul, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Carla J Abbott, Myra B McGuinness, Lauren N Ayton, Chi D Luu, Steven Greenstein and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406416 (Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03406416 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A 44 Channel Fully Implantable Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMobius Medical Pty Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled4ConditionsRetinitis Pigmentosa, ChoroideremiaArms44Ch Bionic Eye Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Static or Temporal? Semantic Scene Simplification to Aid Wayfinding in Immersive Simulations of Bionic Vision.Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel A TitchenerBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David A X NayagamBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica KvansakulBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Maria KolicCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth K BaglinCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carla J AbbottCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Myra B McGuinnessCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren N AytonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chi D LuuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steven GreensteinBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
William G KentlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mohit N ShivdasaniBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Penelope J AllenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew A PetoeBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUBionics Institute · AUAustralian College of Optometry · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To report the long-term observations of the electrode-tissue interface and perceptual stability in humans after chronic stimulation with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Methods: Four subjects (S1-4) with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa received the implant unilaterally (NCT03406416). Electrode impedances, electrode-retina distance (measured using optical coherence tomography imaging), and perceptual thresholds were monitored up to 181 weeks after implantation as the subjects used the prosthesis in the laboratory and in daily life. Stimulation charge density was limited to 32 µC/cm2 per phase. Results: Electrode impedances were stable longitudinally. The electrode-retina distances increased after surgery and then stabilized, and were well-described by an asymptotic exponential model. The stabilization of electrode-retina distances was variable between subjects, stabilizing after 45 weeks for S1, 63 weeks for S2, and 24 weeks for S3 (linear regression; Pgradient > 0.05). For S4, a statistically significant increase in electrode-retina distance persisted (P < 0.05), but by the study end point the rate of increase was clinically insignificant (exponential model: 0.33 µm/wk). Perceptual electrical thresholds were stable in one subject, decreased over time in two subjects (linear model; P < 0.05), and increased slightly in one subject but remained within the predefined charge limits (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Chronic stimulation with the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis over 3 years resulted in stable impedances, small individual changes in perceptual electrical thresholds, and no clinically significant increase in electrode-retina distances after a period of settling after surgery. Translational Relevance: Chronic stimulation with the 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant with a charge density of up to 32 µC/cm2 per phase is suitable for long-term use in humans.

Indexed as

Retinitis PigmentosaVisual ProsthesisElectric StimulationHumansMicroelectrodesRetina

Identifiers

PMID35696133
PMCPMC9202334
OpenAlexW4282597475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.