Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35696128›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2022

Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Blood Transfusion in Relation to Donor Sex and Parity: A Natural Experiment.

Jingcheng Zhao, Arvid Sjölander, Gustaf Edgren

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingcheng ZhaoClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arvid SjölanderDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustaf EdgrenClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prior evidence suggests that plasma and platelet transfusions from female and parous donors are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, which has led to the predominant use of male donors for plasma and platelets in many countries. However, studies on red blood cell transfusions have been conflicting. Objective: To determine whether blood donor sex and parity affect mortality of patients undergoing transfusion with red blood cells. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used nationwide blood bank and health register data in Sweden and involved a natural experiment created by donor sex and parity being concealed and randomly allocated. Patients were included if they were 18 to 90 years old, did not have a history of blood transfusion, and received a transfusion between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Patients were followed up from their first red blood cell transfusion until death, emigration, or end of study (June 30, 2018). Data analysis was performed between June 15 and December 15, 2021. Exposures: (1) Female vs male donors and (2) parous or nonparous female vs male donors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival up to 2 years estimated using inverse probability-weighted Kaplan-Meier estimates and relative risk for additional transfusions within 24 hours. Results: Among the 368 778 included patients (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [17.7] years; 57.3% female), 2-year survival differences comparing red blood cell transfusions from female and parous donors to male donors were -0.1% (95% CI, -1.3% to 1.1%) and 0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%), respectively. No statistically significant survival differences were observed regardless of patient sex or age. Median (IQR) hemoglobin counts for female donors (13.5 [13.0-14.0] g/dL) were lower than for male donors (14.9 [14.4-15.5] g/dL). Red blood cell transfusions from female donors were associated with a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI, 1.08-1.17) for additional transfusions within 24 hours but not after adjusting for donor hemoglobin counts (relative risk, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.08). Pretransfusion patient characteristics were naturally distributed as-if randomized. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study involving a natural experiment, after accounting for the lower hemoglobin values in blood from female donors, patients undergoing transfusion with blood from female or parous donors did not have higher 2-year mortality compared with recipients of blood from male donors.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionErythrocyte TransfusionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedParityPregnancyYoung AdultHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID35696128
PMCPMC9194724
OpenAlexW4282571908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.